Laserfiche WebLink
<br />\ <br />I <br />\ ' <br />\'~:colOrado pr~~..:~ <br />r, .. ',",nllo .;; III.r';~~~':lI""~:'Ul'~~'''''''';'''''':~?!'''' , ", ,:'-",......, ,"" '----:-'~-- , ",.. '," " " ' , <br /> <br />! Makirig'a plea to Pueblo County I <br /> <br /> <br />II · Reservoir in a prcsentntion on thc Preferred <br />. Storage Options Plan and critical <br />I,' eXpanSIOn supporters watcr resource needs for the future <br />. of southeastern Colorado. <br />state theIr case, "I want you to really hear from <br />By ANDREA RICH the regional interests," Steve <br />PUEBLO - Supporters for the Arveschoug, general manager of the <br />re-operation and ex.pansion of Southeast Colorado Water Conser- <br />Pueblo Reservo'ir filled Ihe Pueblo vancy District, told the commis- <br />County Commissioners' chambers :;ioners. The District put together the <br />Tuesday when Ihe valley _ upper PSOP, with the sup~rt of 41 com- <br />and lower - turned out to keep mum~le~. orgaOJzatton~ and water <br />Pueblo County on its side. aSSOCiations. ]0 developing the plan. <br />Pueblo County in the past has Arvcschoug said~ recreation, envi- <br />I supported the re-operalion of exist- ronmental and Wildlife needs were <br />I. iog reservoir space to aJlow munic- taken mto consideration. <br />ipal storage, as well as the federal The plan has three main compo- <br />legislation to ask the Bureau of nents: <br />Reclamation to.study the expansion . More effective use of existing <br />of the reservoir tq "a~commodate room in the reservoir. Ellen \t\ a. wet <br />water needs projected through year, Pueblo Reservoir has storage <br />2040, The clly of Pueblo has space available that is not being <br />opposed the federallelllSlatlOn, stat- used by Fryingpan-Arkansas Pro- <br />109 11 Will have a detnmental effect jecl members, The legislalion <br />on plans to ha~e enough water to would give the Bureau of Reclama~ <br />kayak on the. nv~r thr~ugh down~ tion. which operates the reservoir, <br />town. The cllY ,IS asking Pue?lo the authority to contract with <br />County to JOIn In the opposul~n municipalities and rent that space. <br />that .has thus far ~n suc~essfullD In anticipation of this permission, <br />slalllOg HR3881 III Washlllgton, Colorado Springs' Ulilities, Foun.. <br />I County and municipal officials tain, Security, Florence, Salida, <br />" from west, easl anhed north of Pueblo Lamar, the Upper Arkansas Con- <br />I were presentlO ar and participate servancy District. Canon City, Pon- <br /> <br /> <br />~-llE~1 <br />ntE 1RILa Junia. CO <br />(Cleft) ~nty) . . <br />",.F,4,062 ' <br /> <br />.,......_- - - <br />" pue61oCommis-sioners. - <br />, ''These are tembly big commit- <br />ments of a county our size," <br />" Heimerich said of Crowley sup- <br />porting the PSOP and conduit. <br />"Sometimes we have to reach out <br />and grab onto other communities of <br /> <br />1I0J872 <br /> <br />0"- <br />Or. . , '\ ' <br /> <br />l-'n...'",. "'\ <br /> <br />cha Springs and La Junta have <br />requested a combined 38,425 alf of <br />storage from, the 50,000 that gen- <br />erally goes unused, <br /> <br />. Sludyi~g the feasibility of <br />adding new storage to Pueblo <br />Reservoir and tater Turquoise <br />Reservoir. To meet the projected <br />water needs :of the basin. Pueblo <br />Rescnoir would need to be <br />expanded another 50,000 to 75,00 <br />acre-feel. In time, Turquoise would <br />be expanded,another 19,000 alf, If <br />expanded, most of the emities listed <br />above needing existing space would <br />ask for newly built space. Also <br />seeking new space would be Pueblo <br />Wcst, Pueblo Board of Water <br />Works and Otero County, These <br />entities predict needing 69,625 alf <br />of the proposed 50,000-75,000 <br />expansion. <br />, <br />. Limiti~g any further out-of- <br />basin transfers using the Fryingpan- <br />Arkansas system without approval <br />of SECWCD, "The bill also tries to <br />make an attempt to protect this <br />basin," Arveschoug lold the com. <br />missioners. <br /> <br />"We have been very thoughtful," <br />Arveschoug stressed to the com. <br />missio"ners in considering the <br />impacts of these changes, <br /> <br />Where opposition hurts <br />Five other representatives spok., <br />to the damage done to their intel <br />ests if the PSOP legislation con tin <br />ues its holding pattern in Washing <br />ton. <br />Joe Kelley, La Junta's directo <br />of water and waste water treatment <br />spoke on behalf of La Junta and llu <br />communities that want to build; <br />conduit to carry municipal watel <br />from Pueblo Reservoir to Lamar - <br />a concept originally part of the Fry, <br />ingpan-Arkansas Legislation of th, <br />1960s, Kelley explained Ihr <br />pipeline would eliminate transit <br />losses of precious water, improve. <br />the efficiency and performance 01 <br />existing water tre.aiment plants, and <br />make wasle wate~discharge clean- <br />cr. The group can't plan a conduil <br />without knowing how much water <br />it will carrY. The" amOunt of water <br />that can be purchased depends on if <br />the reservoir has foom to keep it. <br />Kelley said the pipeline needs <br />18,000 alf a year to meet custome[ <br />demands ---,. almost twice what is <br />now available in allotted project <br />water. <br />Terry Book. direcror of opera- <br />lions for the Pueblo Board of Water <br /> <br />Pleos. see LITTLf poge 5 <br /> <br />+ <br /> <br />pueblO reSI:!!oU111\.C. ....... ..."V <br />thanked the commissioners for <br />allowing more than an hour of <br />their meeting for this presenta- <br />tion. adding that Pueblo City <br />Council has refused to hear these <br />speakers on this subject. <br />