My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10281
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10281
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:58:06 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:15:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8278.300
Description
Title I - Mexican Treaty
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
9/1/1991
Author
Anne DeMarsay CRBSCF
Title
The Brownell Task Force and the Mexican Salinity Problem - A Narrative Chronology of Events
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />2 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />used-and still uses-most of its Colorado River water to support irrigated agriculture in the <br />Mexicali Valley, this silence seems odd. The history of the treaty suggests that the u.s. and <br />Mexico drew different inferences about quality from the phrase "any and all sources." <br /> <br />Before the completion of Hoover Dam in 1935, destructive spring floods swept through the <br />Colorado Basin almost every year, followed by dangerously low flows in the summer. When <br />the river was in its natural state, Mexico could capture and use only about 750,000 acre-feet of <br />water per year. Hoover Dam made possible the storage of floodwaters and year-round flow <br />regulation, and Mexico stood to receive much more usable water-but the legislation authorizing <br />the dam's construction barred foreign governments from receiving any benefit from it! The <br />1944 treaty contained an apparent compromise: the U.S. would deliver approximately twice as <br />much water to Mexico as it would have been able to use had the Colorado River not been <br />regulated (1.5 million acre-feet) but Mexico would have no say in the source of that water within <br />the Basin, nor in its qua1ity.2 <br /> <br />Until 1961, no problems arose from the salinity of water deliveries. In that year, the <br />Wellton-Mohawk Irrigation and Drainage District in Arizona, near the Mexican border, began <br />to operate a pumped drainage system. To lower the high water table beneath the project, it <br />began to pump highly saline water into its drains-water that was laden with salts that had <br />accumulated in the soils beneath the project from decades of irrigation without drainage. These <br />drainage waters, or "return flows" carried about 6,000 parts per million (ppm) of dissolved salts, <br />and entered the river just above Morelos Dam, the main Mexican diversion point. <br /> <br />In the same year, the U.S. sharply reduced upstream releases-which would have diluted the <br />brackish drainage waters from Wellton-Mohawk-in order to begin filling Lake Powell behind <br />the newly completed Glen Canyon Dam. These two events caused the average annual salinity <br />of water delivered to Mexico at Morelos Dam to jump dramatically, from about 800 ppm in <br />1960 to 1,340 ppm in 1961, to more than 1,500 ppm in 1962. Salinity levels in some months <br />exceeded 2,500 ppm. In November 1961, the government of Mexico filed a formal diplomatic <br />protest, charging the U.S. with violating international law. The International Boundary and <br />Water Commission (IBWC), thejoint U.S.-Mexican agency charged with administering the 1944 <br />treaty, began negotiations on a practical solution. <br /> <br />For the next ten years, Mexican and U.S. scientists, diplomats, and Federal and state officials <br />debated the intent of the 1944 treaty, technical issues, and equities under international law <br />without reaching a permanent solution.3 The Committee of Fourteen-composed of two <br />representatives from each of the seven Basin states- had been created in 1938 to consider basin- <br />wide problems, including the prospective treaty. At the State Department's request, the <br />Committee was revived in the early 1960s to advise the U.S. Section of the IBWC on the <br />salinity issue. <br /> <br />In 1965, the U.S., under Minute No. 218 of the IBWC, agreed to several temporary measures <br />to reduce salinity: extending the Well ton-Mohawk Drain to permit drainage to be bypassed <br />around Morelos Dam (where it would flow to the Pacific Ocean without being diverted for use) <br />during periods of unusually high salinity; replacing about 40,000 acre-feet per year of bypassed <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.