My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10281
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10281
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:58:06 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:15:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8278.300
Description
Title I - Mexican Treaty
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
9/1/1991
Author
Anne DeMarsay CRBSCF
Title
The Brownell Task Force and the Mexican Salinity Problem - A Narrative Chronology of Events
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />6 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Agricultural Research Service (ARS) and Soil Conservation Service (SCS). (A list of Working <br />Group members is also included in Appendix A.) <br /> <br />The Task Force and the Working Group began work immediately after Brownell was sworn in. <br />Two sets of questions faced them. One concerned the international legal aspects of water quality <br />differences, and included such questions as- <br /> <br />. Is Mexico legally obligated to accept Wellton-Mohawk drainage as part of its <br />treaty allotment? <br /> <br />. Is the U.S. legally justified in limiting the improvement in water quality to salt <br />balance equivalence? <br /> <br />. Do Mexican water users have a right to receive water of the same quality as <br />American water users who are served by Imperial Dam?1l <br /> <br />The other set dealt with the means of guaranteeing the quality of water delivered to Mexico, <br />whatever the eventual salinity level-the "technical" solutions. The short- and long-term <br />measures to be considered were much the same as those that had been presented to President <br />Nixon earlier that year. <br /> <br />For three weeks in September of 1972, the Working Group heard presentations on the <br />international legal issues and debated the merits of various positions. Then, as Brownell and <br />Eaton noted in a 1975 article, these questions were set aside.14 Certainly the State Department's <br />desire for a negotiated settlement that would avoid the possibility of litigation in an international <br />court played a part in this decision, but the orders came from the head of the National Security <br />Council-Henry Kissinger. <br /> <br />The National Security Council was the only concerned agency in the Executive Office of the <br />President that was not represented on the Task Force or Working Group, despite Kissinger's <br />well-known interest in U.S.-Mexican relations. As National Security Advisor, he must have <br />been involved in briefing Nixon for the Echeverria visit and in preparation of the joint <br />communique of June. But his position on the issues and his role were unknown to others in the <br />Executive Office. <br /> <br />On September 26, the office of Assistant Secretary of the Interior James Smith received a <br />message from the NSC: the salt balance approach of Minute No. 241 was to be an interim <br />solution only. The final solution would require elimination of the effects of Well ton-Mohawk <br />on salinity levels.15 Wesley Steiner of Arizona, then Chairman of the Committee of Fourteen, <br />remembers hearing the same message from Brownell and Eaton in one of their early meetings <br />with the Committee, during which the word of Kissinger's involvement came OUt.16 But most <br />members of the Working Group and Task Force remained unaware of the change in policy. <br /> <br />Kissinger's directive-to eliminate the effects of Well ton-Mohawk on water deliveries to <br />Mexico-reduced the allowable salinity differential at Morelos Dam to about 100 ppm. (Because <br />all return flows from the project were being bypassed under Minute No. 241, this was the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.