My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10235
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10235
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:57:54 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:13:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8281.910
Description
Colorado River Studies and Investigations -- Grand Valley Salinity Study
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
12/1/1976
Author
Soil Cons Serv
Title
Grand Valley Salinity Study - draft
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />0 <br />N <br />0 2 <br />C <br />...... 3 <br /> 4 <br /> 5 <br /> 6 <br /> 7 <br /> 8 <br /> 9 <br /> 10 <br /> 11 <br /> 12 <br /> 13 <br /> 14 <br /> 15 <br /> 16 <br /> 17 <br /> 18 <br /> 19 <br /> 20 <br /> 21 <br /> 22 <br /> 23 <br /> 24 <br /> <br />.. "-'--~';"""'.^-- <br /> <br />',ti <br /> <br />Both natural runoff and irrigation contribute to the problem, either <br />I <br />by salt concentration or by s~lt loading. Salt concentration is caused <br /> <br />I <br />by the removal of water from the river system through consumptive use by <br /> <br />irrigated crops and phreatophytes. As water is consumed through evapora- <br />, <br />i <br />tion and transpiration, its mlneral constituents remain in the ground <br /> <br />water. Salt loading occurs a~ ground water dissolves subsurface minerals <br /> <br />while flowing back to the COloradO River. <br />at work in the Grand Valley, s~lt loading <br /> <br />Although both processes are <br /> <br />is the major cause of the <br /> <br />salinity Increase. <br /> <br />Ground water return flows from the irrigated area to the Colorado <br /> <br />River contain as much salt now as they did at the Inception of irri- <br /> <br />gation and it Is assumed this will continue because excess water <br /> <br />dissolves salt from the Mancos Shale formation. Two conditions <br /> <br />substantiate this conclusion: (1) water quality information on the <br /> <br />artesian ground water aquifer collected at several well sites by <br /> <br />the U. S. Department of Agriculture in 1915; Agricultural Research <br /> <br />Service-Soil Conservation Service Project in 1951, and Agricultural <br /> <br />Research Service in 1973, to 1975, indicate no change in water quality <br /> <br />of the aquifer. Hydrostatic pressures toward the Colorado River rule <br /> <br />out the river as a source of water to the aquifer; (2) diversions to <br /> <br />the irrigated area since installation of Government Hlghline Canal In <br /> <br />1917 are essentially unchanged. Situations indicate that salt loading <br /> <br />by subsurface return flows to the Colorado River from irrigated areas <br /> <br />have been relatively constant over this 60-year period. <br /> <br />12 <br /> <br />.....L <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.