My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10123
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10123
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 10:55:29 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:09:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8059
Description
Section D General Studies-State Water Plan
State
CO
Date
9/1/1972
Author
CO Water Congress
Title
Environmental Considerations-Colorado Water Congress Newsletter Vol 15 No 9-Water Wells Brought Under Priority System
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. ~ <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />-6- <br /> <br />battery of conflicting pressures leveled by environmental groups and by <br />government agencies. <br />First, the Environmental Protection Agency has told the Interior <br />Department that its draft study of plans for huge coal-burning power <br />plants in the Four Corners area is seriously inadequate and needs exten- <br />sive revision. The EPA suggested that Interior withhold any important <br />decisions affecting these projects until it reconsiders its conclusion <br />that there is no immediate alternative to the proposed power producing <br />units. <br />Already in operation is the Four Corners plant near Farmington, New <br />Mexico, and under construction are the Huntington Canyon plant in Utah <br />and the Navajo plant in Arizona and the San Juan plant in New Mexico. A <br />plant called Kaiparowits is planned for construction in Utah near the <br />Arizona border. Interior's report on these projects said the area's <br />electrical needs "will necessitate some tradeoff with environmental <br /> <br />values. II <br /> <br />Following release of Interior's report EPA ordered operation of <br /> <br /> <br />the Four Corners power plant and the other proposed power plants to re- <br /> <br /> <br />duce their air emissions by 70 percent and that eventually the plants <br /> <br /> <br />would have to reduce emissions by 86 percent to meet EPA primary stan- <br /> <br /> <br />dards and 92 percent to meet secondary standards. <br /> <br /> <br />Charles Murray, enforcement chief for EPA Denver office, expressed <br /> <br /> <br />concern by saying "the best techniques available today can only guarantee <br /> <br /> <br />a 70 percent reduction." Operators of the Four Corners plant argue that <br /> <br /> <br />they have already spent more than $23 million to reduce air pollution <br /> <br /> <br />and that the pollution control costs have raised the price of the in- <br /> <br /> <br />stallation to $350 million. <br /> <br /> <br />Sierra Club leaders from eight Western states, meeting in Denver on <br /> <br /> <br />July 16, adopted a resolution to fight for federal adoption of air <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.