Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />0895 <br /> <br />.".-1..... <br />~~,"~'~.,. <br />.::' ~,....; ..,...... <br />,;! ., '~ <br />~ ' t <br />r. . j ~ <br />~':".'i:~~, ,Z ," <br />~ <br /> <br />UNITED STATES <br />DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR <br />GEOLOGICAL SURVEY <br /> <br />SOUTBllEST J'IELD COMMI'l"l'EE, llEGIOlf SIX <br />302 West'15th Street <br />Aus1:in 14, Texas <br /> <br />J&I1UlU7 16, 1953 <br /> <br />Review Report on Survey for <br />,Flood Control Purgatoire <br />{Picket Wire) River, Colore40 <br /> <br />District Engineer <br />Corps 01' Eng1Deers, U. S. Army <br />Albuquerque District <br />P. O.Box 1538 <br />Albuquerque, Ife'll Mexico, <br /> <br />Dear Sir: <br /> <br />The Geological Survey appreciates your supp~Dg a copy ot your <br />report (In flood cODtrol on the Purgatoire R.1ver tor review end , <br />cOllllllent at ti81d level. As I have previously advised, the Geological <br />Survey's CODcern in reports of this kind is tollllke sure that the <br />planning age'n.cy 11assecured end had &11 opportUl:lityto use all 01' <br />the Geologica;L Survey basic data ontOJlographic mapping, water <br />resources, minerals &I1d geology that might be usetul in planning <br />the pr,oJec1i. ~he Geological Surveyw1sheil to be informed alSo as <br />to what bas1cdata might be needed .to perfect thedevelopJDent <br />in Qrder to plan its :future programs to fit project requirements. <br />It 1spreferable, of course, that the planning reports include <br />specific reference to the need for such data, ,thus strengthening <br />Geological survey requests for appropriations to fiIl&l1ce the <br />collection of'such dat~. <br /> <br />I have asked those of the Survey who are bestqual1j'ied from <br />the standpoint'ot their specialized professional fields end <br />personalkDow1edge of the region to review this report. The <br />Geologic Division is working Jointly with the Bure,au ot Mines in <br />preparing comments on minerals end fuels resources that might be <br />af'fected by the project. These combined comments "ill be mailed <br />direct to YQU by those making this phase of the review. Mr. <br />S. W. Lohman, by letter to you dated December 30, 1952, commented <br />on your report regarding problems that :would be of concern <br />to the Ground Water Branch. I have been advised that your agency <br />has fully utilized all available topo8faphic maps, end that <br />mapping which is generally required of the Geological Survey <br />,for projects of this kind has been, tully sufficient for your needs. <br /> <br />APPENDIX G <br />Exhibit No.4 <br />Page 1 of2 <br /> <br />-.",,, <br /> <br />:;"" .,. ,0..,.-' L ._",~,-.' ,. - <br /> <br />.~" " .~"'-". ,. ", <br /> <br /> <br />. <br />