My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10118
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10118
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:57:23 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:08:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8142.600.30.A
Description
Other Studies - Purgatoire River Transit Loss Study
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
6/1/1953
Author
Corps of Engineers
Title
Review Report on Survey for Flood Control - Volume IV
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />'- <br /> <br />0838 <br /> <br />Reservoir Project was four years. Interest during construction was <br /> <br /> <br />computed ~t 2-l/2'percent on first costs for one-half the estimated con- <br /> <br /> <br />struction period. Amortization and interest on investment were oalou- <br /> <br /> <br />lated for a period of 75 years at the rate of 2-1/2 peroent. <br /> <br /> <br />5. Annual maintenance and operation costs for the projeot inolude <br /> <br /> <br />an item f0r major replacements in addition to ordinary maintenance and <br /> <br /> <br />operation. The annual cost for these replacements was determined by <br /> <br /> <br />applying ~n':;€'re,qt and amortization rates to the present worth of the <br /> <br /> <br />estimated futlrt'J costs for maj or replacements. Future oosts for maj or <br /> <br /> <br />replacemsnts were estimated on the assumption that 80 percent of the <br /> <br /> <br />hwdrauli0, mechanical, and electrical equipment would be replaced onoe <br /> <br /> <br />every /,0 years. No allowance for salvage value was made, since it was <br /> <br /> <br />assllined that the expense of salvage would approximately equal the re- <br /> <br /> <br />sale value of the equipment. <br /> <br /> <br />6. Cost estj,mate. - The oost estimate for the Trinidad Reservoir <br /> <br /> <br />Projeot inoludes an allowance of 20 peroent for oontingenoies and <br /> <br /> <br />12-1/2 percent for engjneering, design, supervision of oonstruotion, <br /> <br /> <br />and overhead. The estimated cost of aoquiring the lands and improve- <br /> <br /> <br />ments in the projeot area was based on an appraisal made specifically <br /> <br /> <br />for the purpose. An evaluation of the ooal deposits in the vicinity <br /> <br /> <br />of the reservoir and an appraisal as to the extent to whioh they would <br /> <br /> <br />be adversely affeoted by seepage from the reservoir was prepared by a <br /> <br /> <br />consultant engineer-appraiser. An allowanoe of approximately 10 per- <br /> <br /> <br />oent was added to land oosts for severance damage and 20 percent was <br /> <br /> <br />added for administrative and overhead costs. <br /> <br /> <br />7. Foundati~reatment. - The foundation grade for the dam was <br /> <br /> <br />determined from five core borings, and a detailed examination of rock <br /> <br /> <br />outcrops which are in evidence over most of the foundation area. Sub- <br /> <br /> <br />surface exploration was by drilling 2-1/2-inch core holes in the rock. <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />APPEND IX E <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.