Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />0876 <br /> <br />very 'rare flooding conte.plated.Rowever, <br />of-way for access from roads built for daa <br />for relocated highway .ight' be required. <br /> <br />'short right- <br />operation or <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />lor the lIIore extensive deVelopment ot' the <br />three-unit proposaloutHnedin abo,ve ,paragraphs, it 1. <br />probable th!iLt sOllie additional acreage would be needed <br />bothforlocat1on and protection of sites se18uted; aad' <br />for .ore extensive access road right-of~way~ Pending <br />detailed stUdy forsitepl'annlng,estilll8.tes ..ust''''e <br />generd. <br /> <br />It is, of course, desirable that planning be <br />carried far enough to permit deterlllination.of definite <br />land needS in tim. for their purChase to be included'in <br />tbat for priaary reservoir requirements.. , <br /> <br />Estilll8.ted Cost of Developmen~ <br /> <br />It' should be recalled ~at a reconDaissance <br />report, such as has been requested, nOTlllally woulti,no1; <br />present area and faCility recommendations to the detail <br />undertakenberein, but since the Nation..l Park Service <br />has beea: requested also to include recreational beJ1e"" <br />fits in tbis report, preliminary planning bas' been done <br />to the extent necessary to arrive at the :iesired ligures. <br />In the absence of a rehnement in planning not practi- <br />cableat this time, estimated c.ost of facilities aust, be <br />very ,general. However, it is considered tha.t the ex~eri- <br />ence-judgment used in selecting the facility units ana <br />their costs will average-out results satisfactory for <br />present requirements and suitable as a basis for further <br />studies. <br /> <br />Emphasis should be given 'the statement that <br />the first cost and benef1tfigures are based'oli th. <br />presently proposed plan of operation tor the priaarf, ' <br />purposes of the reservoir. The alternate figures would <br />apply only in the event the different operational pro- <br />cedurewere fouJ1d feasible and adopted. <br /> <br />Details of estimated costs and ben.flt~ are' <br />shown in the App,ndix. The cost of recreational fa- <br />cilities recommended for the conditions given is <br />$42,600 (and for tbe. suggested Change in reservoir <br />operation,$112,000). <br /> <br />AP.l'ENDIX G <br />Exhibit No.1 <br />Page 17 of 24 <br /> <br />~o' -"_> . <br /> <br />.--,.;: <br /> <br />