Laserfiche WebLink
<br />,< <br /> <br />on.1~15 ' <br /> <br />-45_ <br /> <br />in lie'" :;exico than if beneficial concUi:il'tlve use of the ,raters <br />uere atte;nptec'. to be ;,leasurec1, at '~oints of use, as contended by <br />California. <br /> <br />REBUTTAL <br /> <br />. I 1,~'" ult'. 1i':e ver;' IJrieflJ to relJut 60;':ie ar::::;ul'.lents here made <br />by SlJokes:,len for California interests, ver;' much as I c1,i(1 in the <br />hearin~s on S, 11?5, oe3innin~ at page 481. <br />1. It is arGued that the 1,000,000 acre-feet of water <br />oentioned in article 111(0) of t~e Colorado Co~pact is <br />not a;)ortioned to the lower basin. <br />I sl~-or,lit that the CO;.llJact itself shoHs it Is 2p:Jortioneo, <br />water; that the eviCence in this record, incluCin~ the <br />testimony of i~. ~e~~er, the statalents of ~r. Carpenter, <br />i,lr. Hoover, j'ir. Norvi el, II!". Le\!is, <"m1 Governor C2":i','bell, <br />clearly disclose that the neGotiators of the ,CO'".1)Jcct so re- <br />c;ardecl it ani". that the :ie:'J'oers of Conc;ress so re::::;nrdec1 it <br />1.i1en they 21T'rOve(1 the COr.llJcct; c,nel that the SU;Jreme Court <br />of the United States has held it to be aPl;ortioned 'Cater <br />(Arizona Y. Celifornia, ~92 U. 3., P. 341), <br />The lJarticu12,r c;round of the decision to "hich I (lesire <br />to call 2ttention is the sixth c:;r 0 unc' of the elecision <br />reported on pege 358. <br /> <br />* {l- 4~ i~ .n il- <br /> <br />2. It is arGued that beneficial consumjJtive use is not <br />JlleaE',Ured. by (lepletion of the Coloraelo River. <br />I s u1Jmi t that the nec:;otiators of the c 0'",lp2Ct lTere <br />