My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10052
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10052
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:57:04 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:05:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.111
Description
Central Utah Participating Project
State
UT
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
1/1/1987
Title
Western Resources Wrap-up: 1987 & 1992
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
News Article/Press Release
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />'- <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Page 4 WRW washn x x x settlement <br /> <br />The Indian settlement is included in the CUP agreement. It pro- <br />vides for a final settlement of tribal water claims, and quantifies <br />the tribal water rights of the state's Ute Indians. It provides for <br />further development of the Utes' farming operation, for reservoir, <br />stream, habitat and road improvements on the tribal reservation and <br />for tribal development. Hatch told the Senate on April 10 this In- <br />dian settlement creates "financial investment opportunities in lieu <br />of costly and infeasible water development projects" for the tribe. <br />CUP REFORMS IN AGREEMENT <br />CUWCD recently put out a backgrounder on the CUP agreement in- <br />cluding "precedent-setting reforms." They are as follows: <br />.project features have been redesigned to minimize costs and to <br />protect and enhance the environment. <br />.Accounting reforms de-authorize outdated projects, change cost <br />allocations, "terminate abuses and unjustifiable subsidies." <br />.The agreement requires that binding contracts must exist for <br />not less than 90 per cent of the water to be delivered before spend- <br />ing can begin on developing specific project features. <br />.CUWCD is authorized to construct the remaining project features <br />instead of the Bu/Rec under strict standards of responsibility, in- <br />cluding a ceiling on costs and time limitations on constructing each <br />feature. For the first time a water district--CUWCD--is authorized to <br />construct a major water project in this country. BU/Rec CUP project <br />managers have all gone to work for CUWCD, WRW was told on May 12. <br />.Features requiring further development require a 35 percent <br />non-federal cost~share to be paid concurrently with the 65 percent in <br />federal funding. Cost overruns must be paid 100 percent by non-feds. <br />.Comprehensi ve total system water management is mandated by <br />specific conservation and efficiency improvement goals set by law. <br />.A fish, wildlife and recreation commission is established to <br />provide oversight and administration of all future funds proposed for <br />mitigation and enhancement activities. <br />.Numerous in-stream flow levels are mandated to enhance non-ex- <br />istent and present fisheries. <br />. Uncompleted environmental mitigation is described, scheduled <br />and mandated. <br />.Environmental enhancement opportunities easily incorporated <br />into the project are identified and required to be implemented. <br />.Some funding is provided to a coalition of local outdoor groups <br />to keep the lines of communication open and meaningful participation <br />by these groups in the completion of CUP. One of the criticisms of <br />CUP under the au/Rec's construction program has been that the project <br />had become remote from the state and the local people, even tho they <br />are sharing costs and are beneficiaries of the project. <br />Garn told the Senate on April 10 the CUP agreement in the omni- <br />bus reclamation bill provides for "the delivery of M&I water to <br />nearly 1 million people who reside in Salt Lake and Utah Counties, <br />and it creates a water supply for an additional 400,000 people." Some <br />70,000 acre-feet of CUP water already has been spoken for by the <br />water districts of Salt Lake City and County, WRW was told on May 12. <br />The agreement also provides for the construction of a reliable sup- <br />plemental irrigation system for the people in rural central Utah. <br />(more) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.