Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Page 5 WRW washn x x x Utah <br /> <br />Hatch said the agreement guarantees mlnlmum stream flow protec- <br />tion to 240 miles of Utah streams and rivers. A water conservation <br />plan has to be developed by CUWCD, with local people initially plug- <br />ged into the planning process. It must be approved by the Secretary <br />of Interior to assure that it provides for real water conservation. <br />New management studies totalling $50 million are authorized for <br />a number of purposes including determining how to maximimize use of <br />both surface and groundwater, water pricing, coordinated operations, <br />and storage at certain times of the year to maximimize streamflows <br />when most needed by fish and wildlife and for habitat. <br />"We learned we can work out an agreement in which none of us <br />gets exactly what we want, but we can come close enough to support <br />the agreement," one negotiator told WRW. Several negotiators, in- <br />cluding Christiansen, told WRW they regard it as a "win-win situation <br />for everyone." They are pleased that local people have taken over the <br />project and are doing so under strict accountability standards. <br />CUP still has problems, however. It is in the omnibus reclama- <br />tion water bill (HR 429) totalling $2 billion with projects for a <br />dozen states including provisions relative to the big Central Valley <br />Project (CVPl in California that are highly controversial. (See WRW, <br />Series XXX, No. 13, dated 3-26-92.) Miller hopes to put in the bill <br />the CVP reforms that failed in the Senate now that the bill is back <br />in the House for final action. Hassles over CVP may hold up a confer- <br />ence on the bill, and the conference may be arduous and contentious. <br />If Sen. John Seymour, R-Calif., does not like the outcome on CVP, he <br />is likely to ask President Bush to veto the bill. As this is an elec- <br />tion year, and as California has more electoral votes than any other <br />state, Mr. Bush would be strongly tempted to veto it. <br />The Utah delegation probably can get their CUP agreement auth- <br />orized as separate legislation, but they have not attempted to do so <br />to date. As this would take some time, and they have not started such <br />an effort yet, time might run out on their getting their agreement <br />into the statute books this year. <br />Garn is retiring from the Senate this year, so Utah will no <br />longer have a member on the Senate Appropriations Committee to keep <br />an eye on CUP appropriations. Owens, who provided the initial vital <br />link between the CUP supporters and the environmentalists that re- <br />sulted in the agreement, is running for the Senate, so the state will <br />no longer have this experienced CUP link in the House. "It I s going to <br />be tough for CUP," one of negotiators told WRW. <br />with Bu/Rec out of the picture, it is not clear how CUWCD and <br />the new mitigation commission set up in the agreement will coordinat~ <br />an informed outsider told WRW on May 13. It is generally felt Bu/Rec <br />is not tuned into Capitol Hill, but its engineering experience and <br />savvy will be missed, several negotiators told WRW. **** <br /> <br />------------------------------------------------------------------- <br />------------------------------------------------------------------- <br /> <br />NEW WESTERN URBAN WATER COALITION: Western urban areas are putting <br />together a Western Urban Water Coalition that will be announced here <br />in June, several sources told WRW this week. Urban areas from Cali- <br />fornia, Colorado, Nevada, Oregon and Utah have already signed up, and <br />they hope urban areas will soon join from Arizona and Washington.HCM <br />