Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />0017nn <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />CONCLUSIONS <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />1. The relations of width, depth, and velocity to discharge <br />at a station can be expressed as simple functions. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />2. The rates of increase in a downstream direction in width, <br />depth, and velocity for streams in Kansas are similar <br />to those found for other streams in the Midwest, although <br />the rate is slightly higher and the rate for velocity is <br />slightly lower in Kansas. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />3. Along a single stream and for a constant frequency of <br />discharge, the relations of width, depth, and velocity <br />to discharge can be expressed as simple functio~. <br />However, there is considerable scatter of points about <br />the relation 1 ines. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />4. Statewide general ization permits the prediction of width, <br />depth, and velocity for specified frequencies of discharge <br />and for the average discharge at ungaged locations. <br />Individual predictions are subject to considerable <br />uncertainty. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />5. Information on bed grain size did not improve the state- <br />wide general izations. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />6. Reaeration coefficients can be estimated from the <br />equation k2 = 3.3v/dl .33, using estimates of v and d <br />from the hydraul ie-geometry equations. <br /> <br />7. The equations wil I provide useful information in planning <br />for certain water activities. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />29 <br />