Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ro <br />..... <br />--.J <br />..... <br /> <br />~n <br />.::;:' <br /> <br />Arizona's Growth - Eldridge p. 7 <br /> <br />This question is particularly difficult for irrigated agriculture, because of <br />the large difference in its ability to pay that results from the comparatively <br />low dollar return from its use of water. The problem will be particularly dif- <br />ficult for water-intensive, low value crops like alfalfa, the staple that many of <br />our Western livestock ranchers depend upon. For irrigated agriculture in general, <br />it takes over 4,000 gallons of water to produce $1 of output. Metal mining needs <br />just 58 gallons to produce $1 of output, petroleum refining only g gallons, elec- <br />tronics 2 gallons and textiles 1 gallon! It is obvious that municipal and in- <br />dustrial water users can afford to pay far more for developing water than agri- <br />culture. The buying power of cities is illustrated by the forecast that by 2000, <br />the City of Denver will have bough~ and constructed diversion systems that will <br />take 50% of the I:',~ter out of the former agri cultural SUlllllit counties to its <br />West in the Colorado River Basin. To keep the picture somewhat balanced, we <br />should notice that the return flow from urban use helps water the farms to the <br />East in the Missouri River Basin. It may be that M&I financed water projects <br />during the next 20 years will indirectly improve total water supplies available <br />for irrigated agriculture. But in up-stream areas away from urban centers, the <br />problem will probably get worse rather than better. Will those in the livestock <br />business who are dependent on these upland grazing areas be able to grow with <br />the times? I fear that they will not. High water costs will reduce their profits <br />in a market kept low by livestock supplied from water rich areas where producers <br />don't have to recover high water costs. <br /> <br />There is more than regional price competition. As water becomes more expensive, <br />it tends to go towards higher value crops. Onions, for example, are also water- <br />intensive, but they return a higher income per gallon used. There is a limit to <br />how many onions the country can absorb, at least I hope there is, so alfalfa is <br />not going to be supplanted very soon by onion fields, but the problem is still <br />evident. Higher priced water may induce quite a lot of crop shifting to higher <br />value crops, in order to stay in business. If hay and alfalfa production drops <br />significantly in semi-arid areas with sparse grazing resources, what happens to <br />the livestock industry? I don't know what lies ahead, but I suspect that higher <br />water prices will lead to many changes in traditional Western economic sectors. <br /> <br />7. We don't know what the <br />Southwestern water supplies. <br />good neighboring agricultural <br />water from agricultural use. <br /> <br />demands will be from sunbelt population growth on <br />It seems self-evident that urban sprawl covers up <br />land, reducing acreage in production and taking <br />In point of fact, in the last decade of rapid <br /> <br />.""<-"'-;.:..- ,- <br />