My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP09874
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
WSP09874
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:56:21 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:59:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8407
Description
Platte River Basin - River Basin General Publications
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
7/1/1982
Author
Arthur D Little Inc
Title
Six State High Plains-Ogallala Aquifer Regional Resources Study - Summary
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />ALTERNATIVE STRATEGIES AND INTER-STRATEGY COMPARISONS <br /> <br />To carry out the Congressional directives and to fulfill the High Plains <br />Study Council objectives, two incremental management strategies to reduce <br />water demands in the Region and three strategies to increase regional or <br />subregional water supplies were formulated. These water demand and supply <br />management strategies were evaluated in comparison to prOjected "Baseline" <br />conditions, i.e., the continuation of present trends in use of Ogallala Aquifer <br />water with no new public policies or programs to effect greater water conser- <br />vation or to increase supplies. The probable future of the energy sector and <br />the effect on the High Plains regional and subregional economies was analyzed <br />including projections of future energy prices. The potential for future <br />nonagricultural development in sustaining the regional economy was assessed. <br /> <br />The Framework for Impact Assessment <br /> <br />The water management strategies analyzed in the Study were: <br /> <br />BASELINE: Continuation of current local, state and <br />federal policies and trends; no new state or federal <br />programs (previ ous reference to "agri cultural <br />management" was deleted). <br /> <br />Under the Basel i ne condit ion, it was assumed that state and federa 1 <br />governments would make no new efforts to reduce demands on the Aquifer or to <br />augment the supply in the foreseeable future, i.e., nothing purposeful by way <br />of new or additional public actions. Rather, it was assumed that current <br />(1980) trends in pub 1 i c sector and pri vate sector water demand and supply <br />management would continue. For example, if state or local actions were in <br />progress to all evi ate overdrafts on the ground water, thei r outcomes or <br />impacts would be reflected in the Baseline. Similarly, current trends in <br />crop improvements, crop yields, cropping patterns, and adoption of proven <br />techno 1 ogi ca 1 improvements in water and ag ri cultura 1 management pract ices <br />by farmers faced by increased pumping or other costs were reflected in the <br />Baseline projections, as these would be dictated by rational and normal <br />behavior of the individual farmer operating in a relatively free market. <br /> <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.