My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP09842
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
WSP09842
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:56:07 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:58:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8273.600.30
Description
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control - Federal Agencies - USDA
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
1/1/1991
Title
The Economics and Management of Water and Drainage in Agriculture
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />f;i~. <br />'}>.;""":- <br /> <br />tv <br />--J <br />(.0 <br />...:J <br /> <br />REUSE OF AGRICULTIJRAL DRAINAGE <br /> <br />101 <br /> <br />salinity increase in a river system used for irrigation supply under different <br />strategies of drainage management. <br />The salinity of the soil water resulting from irrigation was calculated from <br />the irrigation water composition and the leaching fraction (L, the fraction of <br />the infiltrated water nO\ consumed in evapotranspiration and which passes <br />beyond the root zone as drainage) after the method of Rhoades (1984<:,1986). <br />In this method the water-uptake distribution within the irrigated root zone is <br />assumed to be 40:30:20:10 by successive quaner-deplh fractions; steady-state <br />chemistry and "piston-displacemenl-type"water flow are also assumed. Rela- <br />live crop ,ieldwas then calculated from the predicted averagesoil water salinity <br />, from knowledge of the plantlolerance to salinity and the assumption that crops <br />respond to the average salinity within their root zone. Each of these assump- <br />tions is sumciently true for the purposes of this chapter (Ingvalson et al.,l976 , <br />and Rhoades and Merrill, 1976). <br />More specifically, the average level ofsoi! salinity (expressed as the electrical <br />conductivity of the saturation-paste extract, ECJ within the crop root zone <br />resulting from the long-term irrigation with a water ofEC~ was obtained from <br /> <br />{IJ EC. = F,' EC.., <br /> <br />where ECiw is the electrical conductivity of the irrigation water and F, is the <br />related cono:n<ration [actor appropriate for 1- F, was obtained [mm the <br />calculable relationship which exists between F, and L (Rhoades, 1982 and <br />1984<:). The relaliveyields achievable as a function of average root zone EC, <br />were obtained lrom the crop salt-tolerance tables of Maas (1986). Analogous <br />values for boron and other specific solutes are also given in this same reference <br />and could be used to evaluate yield losses for such specific solutes. <br />The fraction o[ the irrigation waler that is consumed in evapotranspiration <br />(Y jV..) is related to Las <br /> <br />[2J VjViw = (l-L). <br /> <br />For the purposes of lhis chapter, the volumes of V.. were normalized by <br />expressing them relative to V ,j.e., for the case where V is taken to be equal <br />ft ft <br />to 1. <br />These relative results (yields and volume ratios) were used to evaluate <br />whether blending drainage water with good quality water would be detrimen- <br />lal, or not, with respect to reducing Ihe volume of Ihe tOlal water supply that <br />could be used for crop growth withoulloss in yield. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.