Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I"\) <br />-J <br />Q <br />0'> <br /> <br />. . ~'." <br />:"-:<) <br /> <br />'. <br />..,', <br /> <br />100 <br /> <br />APPROACHES TO DRAINAGE PROBLEMS <br /> <br />Broadly spe.aking, users ofa water supply may be classified inlO two groups: <br />(1) Those who concentrate the water in the process of use, and (2) those who <br />do not. The firstgroup of users suffer pOlential disbenefit under Ihe "blending" <br />philosophy of waler quality protection. The blending process may limilthe <br />maximum practical benefit that can be derived from the tOlalwatersupply. For <br />example,the return of excessively saline waters to the water supply, even when <br />sufficient dilution occurs to keep the salinity of the mixture within acceptable <br />limits, reduces the quantity of the watersupply Ihatcan be used productively 10 <br />growsalt.sensitive crops (Rhoades, 1989). In this chapter, the factor limiting <br />crop growth is assumlid to be the presence of excessive total dissolved salts in <br />Ihewater (salinity), but an analogous case could also be made for boron or any <br />other constituent that is toxic to plants. <br />The ultimate objective of water quality protection should be to permit the <br />maximum practical benefit (use) from the available water supply. The pur- <br />poses of this chapter are (1) to provide evidence--conceptual and empirical-- <br />that the blending approach typically used forwaterqualityprOlection can result <br />in economic losses to the agricultural community as a whole and (2) to suggest <br />a me.ans to de.al with the "disposal" of saline agricultural drainage which <br />provides gre.ater practical benefit from the tOlal water supply than blending <br />does. The theme of this chapter is that different water qualities may have <br />relative advantages that can be re.alized by application 10 different crops at <br />different periods in the growing se.ason. <br /> <br />CONCEPTIJAL FRAMEWORK <br /> <br />In considering acceptable salinity levels for irrigation water, it is important <br />to recognize that the ,higher its salinity', the lower the percentage of IOtal <br />volume that can be beneficially consumed for crop production. <br />Plants must have access to water ofa quality that can be consumed without <br />the concentration of salts (individually or totally) becoming excessive for <br />adequate growth. In the process of transpiration, plants essentially perform <br />reverse osmosis; the salts in the irrigation water are concentrated in the <br />remaining unused soil water, which will ultimately become drainage. A plant <br />will not grOw properly when the salt concentration in the soil water exceeds its <br />specific limit under the given conditions of climate and management (Bern. <br />stein, 1975), Thus, not all of the water can be consumed by a plant if a water <br />supply contains salt. <br />A hypothetical case study was made to illustrate the effects of blending and <br />of alternative drainage management practices on the usability of water supplies <br />and the subsequent economic ramifications. The case study compares the <br />losses in crop yield and in the volumes of consumable water resulting from <br /> <br />~ <br />