Laserfiche WebLink
<br />o <br />o <br />'"J ... <br />00 <br />~ <br />eJ\ <br /> <br />:i <br />, <br />"~I <br />" <br />Ii <br />, II <br /> <br />, , pil <br />)1 <br /> <br />;,/ <br />I <br />!~ <br />, II <br />" <br />"rl <br />. ~II <br />"J1 <br />,,:11 <br />'0< "":1 <br />-::;:,II[ <br />'II <br />I <br />'1'1 <br />",,':1 <br />I <br />:!I <br /> <br />i <br />II <br />, ,III <br />i <br />j <br />:i <br />- --:1 <br />>-<1 <br /> <br />';' "'II <br /> <br />I! <br />L <br /> <br />"r <br /> <br />In addition to these water resource studies, <br />the District has maintained stream gaging stations <br />.t Salida, Canon City, Pueblo and tbe Apisbapa <br />River for many years, and the readings are taken <br />daily by the Staff during the irrigation season, and the <br />mformation is disseminated widely throughout the <br />Valley, to assist Official Agencies and water users in <br />obtaining the maximum benficial use of the waters <br />available at that specific time. <br /> <br />WATER LEGISLATION <br /> <br />The Board of Directors of the District has had <br />a longtime Policy of "Legislation rather than Litiga- <br />tion", when it comes to water matters. They know <br />the Water Programs of the State were created orig- <br />inally under the Constitution, and then by Statutes <br />authorized by the General Assembly through the demo- <br />cratic process. Expensive litigation has not created <br />a new drop of water. and it is essential, therefore, <br />that the Legislative process be used to develop water <br />management programs in the best interests of all. <br /> <br />Since 1967, the members of the Colorado General <br />Assembly have devoted a great deal of time studying <br />and passing Water Legislation which would update <br />the archaic Water Laws, with the hope they would <br />provide a more beneficial use of the limited water sup- <br />ply for the citizens of the State of Colorado. This ef- <br />fort came to a culmination in 1969, when the Legis- <br />lature passed the sweeping ~.W ater Rights and Deter- <br />mination Act oC 1969", which it was hoped would com- <br />pletely update the Water Laws, and it would, therefore, <br />not be necessary for the Legislature to enact any ad- <br />ditional Legislation pending the testing of the 1969 <br />Act. However. in 1970 it became apparent there were <br />still some flaws, and a number of administrative and <br />supplemental Bills were passed. Again in 1971 it be- <br />came apparent that a true Colorado Water Manage- <br />ment Plan could not be fully implemented without the <br />passage of additional Legislation. Consequently, dur- <br />ing the 1971 Session, twelve House Bills and thirteen <br />Senate Bills were introduced, of which eight House <br />Bills were ultimately passed; and nine of the Senate <br />Bills were passed. This Legislation further corrected <br />inadequacies, and it was the strong desire of the Gov- <br />~rnor. the members of the General Assembly, Official <br />Water Agencies and water users about the State. that <br />no further Water Legislation be introduced until the <br />Laws on the Books could be tested and tried. However, <br />in November it became apparent there were still minor <br />inadequacies, and it was expected the Governor would <br />place several water matters on his Call, paramount of <br />which was the relationship of the water supply to Sub- <br />division Development. which is increasing at an alarm- <br />ing rate throughout the entire State of Colorado. <br /> <br />~ ;. <br /> <br />WINTER STORAGE PROGRAM <br /> <br />Long before the Fryingpan-Arkansas Project was <br />authorized by the Congress in 1962, water users in <br />the Valley realized the absolute necessity for adequate <br />storage facilities to hold their decreed Arkansas River <br />waters during periods of surplus, in order that they <br />might be used later when water was in short supply. <br />Evidence of this gras'S root interest is shown in Min. <br />utes of meetings of the Boards of Directors of the ma- <br />jority of the Ditch and Canal Companies as far back <br />as April 22, 1949, when Official Statements of Policy <br />were adopted by said Boards. indicating their interest <br />in some form of Winter Storage Program as an inte- <br />gral part of the Fryingpan-Arkansas Project. <br /> <br />In 1970, the members of the Board of Directors <br />of the District commenced a cursory study of this con- <br />cept wilh Officials from the Bureau of Reclamation, <br />and early in 1971 the Board authorized the General <br />Manager and Officials from the Bureau to commence <br />informal meetings with members of the Boards of Di- <br />rectors of the thirteen eligible Ditch and Canal Com- <br />panies throughout the Valley, in order that an ex- <br />change of ideas might be had. and some type of an <br />experimental program might be developed prior to the <br />completion of Pueblo Dam. Commencing on October <br />4, 1971 and ending December 9, 1971, representa- <br />tives from the District and the Bureau did hold meet- <br />ings with the Boards of Directors of twelve of the thir- <br />teen Companies, being unable to arrange a specific <br />meeting with Officials of the Excelsior. <br /> <br />During these informal meetings it was determined <br />there was a continuing interest in some form of Win~ <br />ter Storage as a part of the Project, and a wide variety <br />of concepts were developed. Several Companies felt <br />the suggested five month period was too long, due to <br />the necessity of some winter irrigation, while others <br />felt it was absolutely necessary. A major topic of <br />discussion was the suggested allocation of winter <br />waters stored in either Pueblo Reservoir, or existing <br />off-stream reservoirs. and the procedure for calling <br />owned winter stored water. <br /> <br />I, <br /> <br />Officials from the District and the Bureau plan <br />to continue to meet informally with Officials from the <br />eligible Ditch and Canal Companies, as well as others <br />who indicate an interest during 1972, in order that <br />a more specific and more acceptable program might be <br />developed prior to completion of Pueblo Dam, and <br />the availability of this much needed, and apparently, <br />much sought after feature of the Fryingpan-Arkansas <br />Project. <br /> <br />. .. " " . ~::;(: :;-::; :-":'>:'". .:.... ,;:..;...~"..., ..-::.:. ;.0 :::. ".:".:~ ".~:':"~:"..""- .~.~~.;: "'.:7:;:.'::::':.:':: '. ',..~...' ?"..-cr<;<; .,.~.. ~~'~-.'-'" ..- . -~. "": .;:....; <br />