|
<br />o
<br />o
<br />'"J ...
<br />00
<br />~
<br />eJ\
<br />
<br />:i
<br />,
<br />"~I
<br />"
<br />Ii
<br />, II
<br />
<br />, , pil
<br />)1
<br />
<br />;,/
<br />I
<br />!~
<br />, II
<br />"
<br />"rl
<br />. ~II
<br />"J1
<br />,,:11
<br />'0< "":1
<br />-::;:,II[
<br />'II
<br />I
<br />'1'1
<br />",,':1
<br />I
<br />:!I
<br />
<br />i
<br />II
<br />, ,III
<br />i
<br />j
<br />:i
<br />- --:1
<br />>-<1
<br />
<br />';' "'II
<br />
<br />I!
<br />L
<br />
<br />"r
<br />
<br />In addition to these water resource studies,
<br />the District has maintained stream gaging stations
<br />.t Salida, Canon City, Pueblo and tbe Apisbapa
<br />River for many years, and the readings are taken
<br />daily by the Staff during the irrigation season, and the
<br />mformation is disseminated widely throughout the
<br />Valley, to assist Official Agencies and water users in
<br />obtaining the maximum benficial use of the waters
<br />available at that specific time.
<br />
<br />WATER LEGISLATION
<br />
<br />The Board of Directors of the District has had
<br />a longtime Policy of "Legislation rather than Litiga-
<br />tion", when it comes to water matters. They know
<br />the Water Programs of the State were created orig-
<br />inally under the Constitution, and then by Statutes
<br />authorized by the General Assembly through the demo-
<br />cratic process. Expensive litigation has not created
<br />a new drop of water. and it is essential, therefore,
<br />that the Legislative process be used to develop water
<br />management programs in the best interests of all.
<br />
<br />Since 1967, the members of the Colorado General
<br />Assembly have devoted a great deal of time studying
<br />and passing Water Legislation which would update
<br />the archaic Water Laws, with the hope they would
<br />provide a more beneficial use of the limited water sup-
<br />ply for the citizens of the State of Colorado. This ef-
<br />fort came to a culmination in 1969, when the Legis-
<br />lature passed the sweeping ~.W ater Rights and Deter-
<br />mination Act oC 1969", which it was hoped would com-
<br />pletely update the Water Laws, and it would, therefore,
<br />not be necessary for the Legislature to enact any ad-
<br />ditional Legislation pending the testing of the 1969
<br />Act. However. in 1970 it became apparent there were
<br />still some flaws, and a number of administrative and
<br />supplemental Bills were passed. Again in 1971 it be-
<br />came apparent that a true Colorado Water Manage-
<br />ment Plan could not be fully implemented without the
<br />passage of additional Legislation. Consequently, dur-
<br />ing the 1971 Session, twelve House Bills and thirteen
<br />Senate Bills were introduced, of which eight House
<br />Bills were ultimately passed; and nine of the Senate
<br />Bills were passed. This Legislation further corrected
<br />inadequacies, and it was the strong desire of the Gov-
<br />~rnor. the members of the General Assembly, Official
<br />Water Agencies and water users about the State. that
<br />no further Water Legislation be introduced until the
<br />Laws on the Books could be tested and tried. However,
<br />in November it became apparent there were still minor
<br />inadequacies, and it was expected the Governor would
<br />place several water matters on his Call, paramount of
<br />which was the relationship of the water supply to Sub-
<br />division Development. which is increasing at an alarm-
<br />ing rate throughout the entire State of Colorado.
<br />
<br />~ ;.
<br />
<br />WINTER STORAGE PROGRAM
<br />
<br />Long before the Fryingpan-Arkansas Project was
<br />authorized by the Congress in 1962, water users in
<br />the Valley realized the absolute necessity for adequate
<br />storage facilities to hold their decreed Arkansas River
<br />waters during periods of surplus, in order that they
<br />might be used later when water was in short supply.
<br />Evidence of this gras'S root interest is shown in Min.
<br />utes of meetings of the Boards of Directors of the ma-
<br />jority of the Ditch and Canal Companies as far back
<br />as April 22, 1949, when Official Statements of Policy
<br />were adopted by said Boards. indicating their interest
<br />in some form of Winter Storage Program as an inte-
<br />gral part of the Fryingpan-Arkansas Project.
<br />
<br />In 1970, the members of the Board of Directors
<br />of the District commenced a cursory study of this con-
<br />cept wilh Officials from the Bureau of Reclamation,
<br />and early in 1971 the Board authorized the General
<br />Manager and Officials from the Bureau to commence
<br />informal meetings with members of the Boards of Di-
<br />rectors of the thirteen eligible Ditch and Canal Com-
<br />panies throughout the Valley, in order that an ex-
<br />change of ideas might be had. and some type of an
<br />experimental program might be developed prior to the
<br />completion of Pueblo Dam. Commencing on October
<br />4, 1971 and ending December 9, 1971, representa-
<br />tives from the District and the Bureau did hold meet-
<br />ings with the Boards of Directors of twelve of the thir-
<br />teen Companies, being unable to arrange a specific
<br />meeting with Officials of the Excelsior.
<br />
<br />During these informal meetings it was determined
<br />there was a continuing interest in some form of Win~
<br />ter Storage as a part of the Project, and a wide variety
<br />of concepts were developed. Several Companies felt
<br />the suggested five month period was too long, due to
<br />the necessity of some winter irrigation, while others
<br />felt it was absolutely necessary. A major topic of
<br />discussion was the suggested allocation of winter
<br />waters stored in either Pueblo Reservoir, or existing
<br />off-stream reservoirs. and the procedure for calling
<br />owned winter stored water.
<br />
<br />I,
<br />
<br />Officials from the District and the Bureau plan
<br />to continue to meet informally with Officials from the
<br />eligible Ditch and Canal Companies, as well as others
<br />who indicate an interest during 1972, in order that
<br />a more specific and more acceptable program might be
<br />developed prior to completion of Pueblo Dam, and
<br />the availability of this much needed, and apparently,
<br />much sought after feature of the Fryingpan-Arkansas
<br />Project.
<br />
<br />. .. " " . ~::;(: :;-::; :-":'>:'". .:.... ,;:..;...~"..., ..-::.:. ;.0 :::. ".:".:~ ".~:':"~:"..""- .~.~~.;: "'.:7:;:.'::::':.:':: '. ',..~...' ?"..-cr<;<; .,.~.. ~~'~-.'-'" ..- . -~. "": .;:....;
<br />
|