Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Future <br />Conditionsll <br />Plannin Alternatives <br />Future <br />'Without <br /> <br />TABLE 3. SUMMARY RATINGS <br />ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION <br />MOAPA VALLEY SUBEVALUATION UNIT, NEVADA <br /> <br />RESOURCE USE <br /> <br />Present <br />Conditionsll <br /> <br />Cropland Production <br />Fish Habitat <br /> <br />3 <br />3 <br />4 <br />3 <br />2 <br /> <br />Industrial Water Supply <br /> <br />Irrigation Water <br /> <br />Low F1 ow <br /> <br />Municipal Water S~pply <br />Pastureland Production <br />Rangeland Production (not applicable) <br /> <br />3 <br />3 <br /> <br />Recreation <br /> <br />3 <br />3 <br />3 <br />2.5 <br />2 <br />3 <br /> <br />Wildlife Habitat <br /> <br />Economic <br /> <br />Visual Quality of Landscape <br />Social <br /> <br />Unique, Cultural, Historical, and Natural <br /> <br />Composite Rating <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br /> <br />3 <br />3 <br />4 <br />3 <br />2 <br />3 <br />3 <br /> <br />3 <br />3 <br />4 <br />3 <br />3 <br />3 <br />3 <br /> <br />3 <br />3 <br />3 <br />2.5 <br />2 <br />3 <br /> <br />3 <br />4 <br />3 <br />2.5 <br />2 <br />3 <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />1I The rating scale is from 1 to 5: 1, unsuited; 2, poor; 3, fair or <br />neutral; 4, good; and 5, excellent. <br /> <br />x <br /> <br />OOSI2,f <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />! <br />[ <br />[ <br />[ <br />[ <br />[ <br />[ <br />[ <br />[ <br />[ <br />[ <br />[ <br />[ <br />[ <br />[ <br />I <br /> <br />3 <br />3 <br />4 <br />~ <br />3 <br />3 <br />3 <br /> <br />3 <br />4 <br />3 <br />2.5 <br />2 <br />3 <br /> <br />3 <br />