Laserfiche WebLink
<br />TABLE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS _ <br />MOAPA VALLEY SUBEVALUATION UNIT, NEVADA <br /> <br /> Al TERNATIVE <br />UNIT FUTURE WITHOUT 1/ ~ <br />No. 1 No. <br />$1,000 120.0 1.628.0 1,860.0 <br />$1.000 120.0 1,830.0 3,240.0 <br />$1,000 ~ 101.0 101.0 <br />$1,000 250.0 3,559.0 6,201.0 <br />$1,000 ~ 408.5 464.1 <br />$1,000 410.0 3,967.5 5,665.0 <br />$1,000 303.8 1.546.6 2,208.4 <br />$1,000 713.8 5,514.1 7,873.5 <br /> <br />ITEM <br /> <br />COST (ONE-TIME): <br /> <br />Onfarm Construction <br />Delivery System Construction <br />Eroston Control Construction <br /> <br />Total Construction <br />Technical Assistance (10 years) <br />Subtotal <br />Interest CastY <br /> <br />Total Installation <br /> <br />ANNUAL c05T11 <br /> <br />Installation <br />Operation. Maintenance and Replacement (OM&R) <br />During Installation <br />Following Installation <br />Fol1owup Technical Assistance (25 years) <br />Total <br /> <br />$1,000 62.0 478.5 683.3 <br />$1,000 ' 20.1 40.1 37.9 <br />$1,000 18.0 60.1 55.3 <br />$1,000 ~ 16.0 16.0 <br />$1,000 116.1 594.7 792.5 <br /> <br />ANNUAL BENEFITS: 5J <br /> <br />Salinity Reduction (Downstream) <br />Increased Efficiency of Crop Production <br />Other Water Uses <br />Subtotal <br /> <br />Benefits During Installation (10 Years) <br />Total <br /> <br />$1,000 525.6 876.0 <br />$1,000 238.0 354.0 <br />$1,000 90.8 198.0 <br />$1,000 854',4 1,428.0 <br />1,000 405.7 678.0 <br />$1,000 1,260.1 2,106.0 <br />$1,000 665.4 1,313.5 <br />Tons/Year 11,800 19,500 <br />"9/1 1.2 2.0 <br />Acre.Feet 2,900 5,000 <br />Acre-Value 21 21 <br />Acre-Value 114 114 <br />Gallons/Year 670 1,000 <br /> <br />ANNUAL NET BENEFITS: <br />PHYSICAL EFFECTS <br /> <br />SaH Load Reduction W <br />Salt Concentration Reduction <br />Net Annual Increase of Water in River System <br /> <br />Wetland Habitat Lost <br />Upland Habitat Gained <br /> <br />Onfarm Increase in Fossil Fuel <br />ReqUirement (Average Annual) <br /> <br />1/ AHernative No.1 - Use existing canal and lateral systems with major repairs, improve onfann irrigation <br />systems and erosion control. <br /> <br />~ Alternative No.2 - Improved canal. pipeline and lateral systems, onfarm irrigation systems and erosion <br />control. Minimum deep percolation and high irrigation efficiency. <br /> <br />11 Compound interest at seven and ane~e1ght percent on expenditures (equal amounts) each year for ten years <br />with no change in the last year. <br /> <br />!I July 1979 price base, 25 year life and interest at seven and one-eight percent. <br /> <br />!I 8enefits of Alternative No.1 and No.2 are measured from future without a salinity program conditions. <br /> <br />!I Colorado River at Imperial Dam, near Yuma, Arizona. <br /> <br />ix <br /> <br />003123 <br /> <br />j: <br />i <br />