Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, I <br /> <br />1 share assistance or total federal financing for the irrigation delivery ~ystem <br />2 in Lower Valley. Prope~ irrigation water management of improved systems will <br />3 be necessary to accomplish the salinity control objectives. <br /> <br />4 TABLE 1. ANNUAL LEVEL OF FUNDING FOR 10 YEAR INSTALLATION PERIOD, <br />ALTERNATIVE 2, MOAPA VALLEY SUBEVALUATION UNIT, NEVADA <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />6 Ann ua 1 Federa 1 Funding Annual Other Funding Annual <br /> --------------------------------- ---------------------------- ---------- <br />7 <br /> Construction!! Technical <br />8 Assistance Total Construction 'OM&R Total Total <br />9 $390,100 $46,400 $436,500 $130,000 $33,800 $163,800 $600,300 <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />!! July 1979 Prices - Based on 75 percent federal cost-sharing assistance. <br /> <br />11 <br /> <br />12 Table 2 is a summary of significant effects and Table 3 is a summary of <br /> <br />13 environmental ratings for alternative resource uses. Environmental evaluation <br />14 inventory worksheets are in Appendix A. The study results in Table 3 show no <br />15 adverse environmental impacts due to the proposed salinity control measures. <br />16 Improvement in environmental conditions will occur with implementation of the <br /> <br />17 recommended plan. Irrigation water delivered to the Overton Wildlife Refuge <br />18 near Lake Mead will be of better quality. The improved low flow water quality <br />19 and the vegetation to be established to control erosion will enhance wildlife <br />20 habitat. <br /> <br />21 <br /> <br />22 Physical land treatment of rangeland in Moapa Valley can not be justified <br /> <br />23 <br /> <br />and is not considered in this plan. There is no forest land. Unique cultural, <br /> <br /> <br />historical, archeological, or natural resources will not be disturbed by the <br /> <br />24 <br /> <br />25 <br /> <br />003121 <br /> <br />vi i <br />