Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> 5 <br /> 6 <br /> 7 <br /> 8 <br /> 9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br /> <br />1 Erosion control improvements are estimated to have a total installation <br />2 cost of $161,200 or an annual cost of $14,000. Operation and maintenance cost <br />3 is estimated to be $3,000 ahnually. <br />4 <br /> <br />! <br />[ <br />[ <br />[ <br />[ <br />[ <br />[ <br />[ <br />[ <br />[ <br />[ <br />r <br />. <br /> <br /> <br />[ <br />[ <br />[ <br />[ <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Installation for Alternative 2 including $464,100 for technical assistance <br />totals $7,873,500 or $683,300 annual cost. Total program cost with operation, <br />maintenance and replacement, and fo110wup technical assistance added in is <br />$792,500 annually. <br /> <br />Downstream and onfarm annual benefits increase during installation and total <br />$1,428,000 following installation. Downstream annual benefits are $876,000 based <br />on a reduction of 2.0 milligrams per liter in sait concentration in the Colorado <br />River at Imperial Dam near Yuma, Arizona. Water used for 'irrigation would be <br />reduced 5,000 acre-feet. An estimated 86 percent of this water would be applied <br />to other uses and has a value of $198,000 for other uses based on the value of <br />water used for agriculture in the valley. Annual onfarm benefits accruing from <br />implementing Alternative 2 are $354,000. This includes annual labor savings of <br />$72,000. Total program benefits are $2,106,000 annually ($1,428,000 for a 25 year <br />period and $678,000 during the installation period). The ratio of benefits to <br />costs is 2.7 to 1.0. <br /> <br />Implementation of Alternative 2 could require a 75 percent or greater federal <br />cost-share assistance to assure farmer participation. Land users would furnish <br /> <br />the remaining 25 percent or less, plus annual operation, maintenance, and replace- <br />ment costs. See Table 1. High local indebtedness may require substantial cost- <br /> <br />003120 <br /> <br />vi <br />