WSP09805 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

O!:l2!.35 Record of DecisIOn The Forest Service will work closely with the Army Corps of Engineers in assessing suitable sites on NFS lands for wetlands compensation under the Clean Water Act, Section 404 permitting process, if necessary. Coordination will also be required between the two agencies as this ROD stipulates that the Army Corps of Engineers be invited to participate in review of construction plans for key areas. Several items of coordination with the Colorado Division of Wildlife are also important. The first relates to involvement in Forest Service review of construction and summer operating plans. I have viewed this input as valuable in the past and would like for it to continue as the Aspen Highlands Ski Area is developed. The analysis in the EIS was based on the current permitted capacity of 4,500 SAOT. As disclosed in the EIS, the limiting factor for skier numbers is the initial access capacity of the facilities. As a result of this approval, the EIS estimates the ski area capacity at about 3,480 SAOr. Therefore, I am requiring that the permitted capacity of the Aspen Highlands Ski Area be changed to 3,500 SAOT. Through this decision. I am requiring that the Aspen Skiing Company make skier visitation figures available to the Forest Service on a daily basis throughout the ski season. Some type of monitoring system will need to be developed with the intent that when the daily number of skiers exceeds 3,500 SAOrs on ten (10) or more days of the ski season, then a mutually acceptable strategy for limiting numbers will be jointly devised and implemented. Any request to increase the approved capacity would trigger further environmental review. Frequent coordination between the Aspen Skiing Company and the Forest Service will be required as construction plans are prepared. reviewed, and modified for the Aspen Highlands Ski Area development. In addition. without setting any specific requirements, the drainage control and vegetation management plans must be completed prior to the construction of any activities approved in the 1994 Decision Notice and any activities approved in this Record of Decision. It is important that the MDP be updated to reflect the long-range vision for the entire ski area. FINDINGS REQUIRED BY OTHER LAWS As Forest Supervisor, I am authorized to manage the White River National Forest in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. This authority, which includes approval of special use permits for ski areas. is delegated to me through agency policy described in the Forest Service Manual 1200. RELEVANT LAWS AND REGULATIONS I have considered the relevant laws and regulations including but, not limited to: the Organic Administration Act of 1897; the Weeks Act of 1911; the Multiple Use-Sustained Yield Act of 1960; the Forest and Rangeland Renewable Resource Planning Act of 1974; the Clean Air Act as amended; the Clean Water Act; Protection of Wetlands Executive Order 11990; the Safe Drinking Water Act; the Endangered Species Act; the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended; the Archeological Resources Protection Act of 1979; the Native American Religious Freedom Act; and the National Forest Management Act of 1976. In addition, I have considered relevant planning documents such as the Rocky Mountain Regional Guide, the White River National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan, and other documents incorporated by reference in the EIS. Furthermore, I have considered the effects disclosed in the EIS and public comments received during the public involvement process. I have Findings Required by Other Laws Relevant Laws and Regulations 37