Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />.e <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />from Stage One would be evaluated before deciding <br />to proceed with construction of the rest of the <br />unit. <br /> <br />Grand V~lJ_~!].!.!:. <br />llarch 1980 <br />Page 2,of 2 <br /> <br />wells in the Reed Wash Study Area; (3) samples <br />and water levels from an extensive network of <br />wells vallcyv,idc; nnd (4) computation of water <br />and salt budgets for the Grand Valley and for <br />the Reed Hash Study Area. <br /> <br />Stage One development would involve the concrete <br />lining and rehabilitation of structures along a <br />6.S-mile section of the Government Highline Ca- <br />nal between Big Salt Hash and Hack Wnsh in the <br />western end of Grand Valley. Thirteen laterals <br />that now serve the area under the canal section <br />to be lined would be consolidated into 11 and <br />placed in pipe sections. About 6.5 miles of <br />interceptor ditch and four small detention ponds <br />would be constructed above the canal .section to <br />prevent runoff from entering the canal. Some <br />existing cross-drainage features would be en- <br />larged. A field station would be constructed <br />as part of the Stage One development for use as <br />a construction headquarters and permanent oper- <br />ating facilities for the entire unit. To com- <br />pensate for wildlife habitat losses, an area of <br />suitable land would be acquired and initially de- <br />veloped) and a watering pond would be construc- <br />ted above the Government Highline Canal. <br /> <br />An extensive drilling program has been completed <br />to obtain subsurface geological data along all of <br />the major canals in the valley. The core samples <br />obtained will yield information on the presence <br />and extent of expansive clays, depths to water, <br />and the type of sedimentary materials, all of <br />which will affect the engineering design of the <br />canals and laterals. <br /> <br />LOCAL INTEREST <br /> <br />Interest in the Grand Valley Systems Improvement <br />Program by Federal, State, and local concerns is <br />continually growing. In keeping with this interest, <br />the Grand Valley Salinity Coordinating Committee <br />meets regularly and is open to all persons and <br />agencies interested in attending. The purpose of <br />the committee is to coordinate all salinity studies <br />and to disseminate information to the public. <br /> <br />Data-gathering will continue) to determine the <br />nature and extent of the salt loading to the <br />Colorado RiVer. Such data will include the <br />following: (1) flow measurements and samples <br />from all major washes and drains; (2) samples <br />and water levels from existing observation <br /> <br />The contract between the u.s. and the Grand Valley <br />Water Users Association for the repayment of opera- <br />tion, maintcnance, and replacement costs on Stage <br />One is still being negotiated. <br /> <br />STATISTICS <br />(TAKEN FROM SPECIAL REPORT FOR STACE ONE) <br /> <br />EFFECTS O~ THE COLORADO RIVER (average annual) <br /> <br />PROJECT FEATURES <br /> <br />Decrease in salt load (tons) . . . <br />Reduction in depXetion (acre~feet) <br />Reduction in salt concentration at <br />Imperial Dam from decrease in <br />salt load (mg/L) . . . . . . . . <br /> <br />24,000 <br />200 <br /> <br />Canal to be lined (mil. 6.8 <br />Laterals to be improved (miles) <br />Existing. . . . . . . 34.2 <br />After construction. . 29.0 <br />Detention ditch (miles). 6.5 <br />Detention ponds (number) . . . . 4 <br /> <br />2.5 <br /> <br />ESTIliATED COSTS <br /> <br />Construction costs (October 1980) <br />Canal lining and improvement <br />Lateral improvement <br />Permanent operating facilities <br />Wildlife plan <br />Investieations prior to authorization <br />Irrigation }illnagement Services!/ <br />Total <br />Interest during construction (5 years <br />at 5.625 percent) <br />Less costs of investigations prior to. <br />authorization <br />Total investment for <br />economic analyses <br />Annual equivalent costs (50 years at <br />5.625 pcrccnt) <br />Construction costs <br />Increased operation, maintenance, <br />and replacement costs <br />Total <br />Cost per mg/L of salinity reduction at <br />Imperial Dnm <br />1/ Represents monies already expended, though <br />program will be discontinued after 1979. <br /> <br />$10,150,000 <br />10,150,000 <br />500,000 <br />975,000 <br />25,000 <br />25,000 <br />$21,825,000 <br /> <br />848,000 <br />-25,000 <br /> <br />$22,648,000 <br /> <br />$1,362,000 <br /> <br />10,200 <br />$1,372,200 <br /> <br />549,000 <br />the . <br /> <br />11 <br />