Laserfiche WebLink
<br />SUmARY SHEET <br />f.r~'1..t~~L.~~~_~_~~;. <br />Colorado River Uasin Salinity Control Projl'ct <br /> <br />!larch 1980 <br />Page 1 of 2 <br /> <br />LOCATION <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The Grand Valley Unit is located in west-central <br />Colorado along the rC':lch of the Colorado River <br />between the tmms of Palisade and Hack, arid <br />includes Grand. Junction, the largest" city in <br />western Colorado. <br /> <br />PURPOSE <br /> <br />The purpose of the Grand Valley Unit is to lower <br />the salt loading to the Colorado River by concrete- <br />lining canals and installing laterals in pipeline <br />and installing "on-farm" improvements. The combi- <br />nation of these programs would reduce the amount of <br />ground water allowed to percolate into the under- <br />lying highly saline soils and Bancos Shale For- <br />mation. It is thought that the estimated 650,000 <br />to 850,000 tons of salt added to the river annually. <br />can be reduced as much as 60 percent by the imple- <br />mentation of the above measures. <br /> <br />STAWS <br /> <br />The Grand Valley Unit is a component of the <br />Colorado River Salinity Control Project and was <br />authorized for construction by the Colorado <br />River Basin Salinity Control Act of 1974 (Public <br />Law 93-320). <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />A feasibility study in the Grand Valley was ini- <br />tiated in FY72 to determine efficiencies of the <br />conveyance systems to be gained by reducing the <br />seepage losses. The various studies conducted <br />include the follmdng: (1) determination of <br />irrigated acreage; (2) canal and lateral sizing <br />studies; (3) determination of the location, ca- <br />pacitYt and condition of present canal and <br />lateral structures; and (4) computations of <br />quantities of construction materials. These data <br />are being used to determine the feasibility level <br />cost. estimate for the entire project. An ap- <br />praisal level cost estimate has been made. <br /> <br />Preliminary environmental studies have been con- <br />ducted on the unit, and a Negative Determination <br />of Environmental Impact was made by the Regiopal <br />Director in June 1978 for an initial phase of <br />the unit known as Stage One. The Commissioner <br />concurred with the determination in July 1978. <br />A Special Report for Stage One of the Grand Valley <br />Systems Improvement Program has been completed. <br />Stage One covers approximately 10 percent of the <br />unit area and is designed to provide information <br />to fully analyze the effectiveness of the proposed <br />plan. <br /> <br />The FY80 appropriations- include $4,127,000 for <br />construction and monitoring of Stage One and <br />continued planning of Stage Two. <br /> <br />PLAN <br /> <br />.' <br /> <br />The preliminary plan for the overall Grand Valley <br />Unit indicates that the salt loading of the Colo- <br />rado River in the Grand Valley could be reduced <br />by about 410,000 tons annually by decreasing the <br />amount of irrigation return flows and conveyance <br />system seepage moving through saline substrata <br />and picking up sales. The reduction would re- <br />sult in a decrease in the salinity of the river <br /> <br />at Imperial Dam of approximately 43 mg/L and <br />would be accomplished by a two-segment pro- <br />gram conducted by the Water and Power Resources <br />Service of the Department of the Interior and by <br />the Soil Conservation Service of the Department <br />of Agriculture. A Water Systems Improvement <br />program would be conducted by the Water and Power <br />Resources Servlee, in which canals aud laterals <br />would be lined or placed in pipe to reduce seepage. <br />Since only lined canals were included in the plan <br />at authorization, the approval of Congress would <br />be required to use pipe for those facilities. <br />On-farm improvements, including upgrading irri- <br />gation systems by cost assistance, improving <br />irrigation management, improving grazing lands and <br />grazing practices on private rangeland, and <br />voluntary wildlife improvement measures, w.ould <br />be conducted by the Soil Conservation Service to <br />reduce deep percolation from farm operations. A <br />wildlife area and watering ponds would be provided <br />by the t~ater and Pmler Resources Service to compen- <br />sate for wildlife habitat losses resulting from the <br />Water Systems Improvement program. This wildlife <br />measure was not included in the unit plan when <br />it was authorized and would require the approval of <br />Congress. <br /> <br />STAGE ONE DEVELOP;ffiNT <br /> <br />The unit would be developed in stages to allow <br />the Water and Pm,'er Resources Service to begin con- <br />struction in a portion of the valley ,.,here plans <br />and designs are complete, 'vhere sufficient data <br />are available to assess the impacts of the initial <br />development while investigations and planning <br />continue on the rest of the unit, and v7here environ- <br />mental impacts would not be significant. Results <br /> <br />" <br /> <br /> <br />10 <br />