Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Q <br /> <br />r- <br /> <br />c <br />.. <br /> <br />~.' <br /> <br />Bond retirement should have begun in January 1946 but no bonds were <br />retired in either 1946 or 1947, although interest payments have been <br />paid currently. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Needs for Development <br /> <br />, , <br /> <br />16. Successful crop production in the Chino Valley Project area <br />requires irrigation to augment the light precipitation. The water <br />supplies available to the District, however, are not sufficient to <br />irrigate adequately all of the 2,53B acres of land under irrigation. <br />Supplemental water therefore is needed to furnish a more nearly ade- <br />quate water supply for irrigation farms of the area. <br /> <br />Plan of Development <br /> <br />17. Three alternative plans for improving the present ~~ter <br />supply of the District w~re inv~stigated by the Bureau of Reclamation. <br />Under the first plan, the connecting cut between Watson Lake and Wil- <br />low Creek Reservoir would be widened and deepened to permit excess <br />water from Granite Creek to be diverted and stored in Willow Creek <br />reservoir which normally does not fill. This would result in develop- <br />ing an additional water supply averaging 355 acre-feet annually. In <br />addition the 11 miles of main cmlal would be lined either with three- <br />inch reinforced concrete or with Ii inch Gunite lining to reduce exces- <br />sive seepage losses. This plan was eliminated from further considera- <br />tion because the storage of Granite Creek water which now spills would <br />invite litigation with downstreom water users having rights asserted <br />to be senior to those of the Chino Valley Irrigation District. In fact, <br />downstream water users have stated that they would contest any attempt- <br />to increase the capacity of present storage facilities of the District. <br />Investigations therefore were concentrated on possibilities for utiliz- <br />ing more effectively the present water supply. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />18. The second plan was confined to lining the 11 miles of main <br />canal in the same manner as contemplated under the first plan. It was <br />discarded because of the heavy expense, in relation to the amount of <br />water saved, of reshaping the entire canal by use of compacted fill, <br />and protecting it from erosion from side drainage. <br /> <br />, ! <br /> <br />19. Under the third plan, all existing structures would be left <br />unchanged but a 36-inch concrete pipe ~~uld be installed throughout the <br />length of the main canal to reduce excessive transmission losses due -to' <br />the canal extending through loose gravel, sand and loamy sand materials. <br />It would also prevent present difficulties-caused by erosion of the <br />canal from its collecting of side drainage. The present pump in the <br />well of the District would be operated during the six-months of the <br />irrigation season to augment the surface water supply. <br /> <br />, . <br />~ <br />~ <br />~ <br />~ <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />~~ <br /> <br />20. This plan was selected as the most attractive of the three, <br />considering cost in relation to additional water that would be made <br />available for irrigation, The elimination of canal erosion would <br />reduce the costs of proper maintenance, and the reduction of seepage <br /> <br />4 <br />