Laserfiche WebLink
<br />;~~, <br /> <br />THE AMITY MUTUAL IRRIGATION COMPANY <br />1539 <br /> <br />.,. <br /> <br />), <br /> <br />washed the Dam out, but came near creating a new cr.annel to the River <br />through rich agriculture land. <br /> <br />The Bureau of Reclamation has let contracts for certain early <br />phases of the Fry-Pan Arkansas project 'Which is expected to take <br />several years to complete. Repayment oC the irrigation part of this <br />project is based on re-regulation oC native waters of the Arkansas <br />as well as the i.n1portation of water from the West slope. This re- <br />regulation will at times affect some of district #67 water supply as <br />well as water normally stored in the Great Plains Reservoirs. <br /> <br />The Trinidad Project is slower getting started but local problems <br />are believed to be the reason for the delay. <br /> <br />Proponents of a permanent Pool in John Martin Reservoir l'ere <br />successful in getting Congress to provide for invasion of the flood <br />control section of the Reservoir by 10,000 a.f. This was accomplished <br />by attaching a provision for this to the Public Works bill Ulat carried <br />high appropriations for aU sections of the country. No hearings were <br />held on the effect this would have on the Arkansas River Compact. <br /> <br />No operating principalS have been presented and as far as we <br />know no water has been purchased to supply or maintain such a pool. <br /> <br />When the Reservoir has storage, the water there can be used <br />by everyone but in periOdS of drought and when the Reservoir is empty <br />many problems arise. Our Ditch Co. and others below John Martin <br />have constantly opposed the establishment of a permanent pool because <br />or the difficulty in administrating the River and because of the loss of <br />return flows in the :Reservoir area. <br /> <br />During the last 5 years accretions to the River in this area is <br />shown in the Compact as follows: <br /> <br /> Inflow In Outflow Below Accretions In <br /> John Martin John Martin Reservoir Area <br />1964 . . .... . . . . 40990 a.r. 59,530 a.r. 18,550 a.r. <br />1963 . . . 77,350 a.r. 87,680 a.r, 10,330 a.r. <br />1962 . . ,124,300 a.r, 147,500 a.f. 25,200 a.r, <br />1961 . . .136,460 a.r, 147,700 a.r, 11,360 a.r. <br />1960 . . ,102,990 a.r, 117,700 a.r. 14,710 a.r. <br /> <br />In 1952 when a 1200 a.t Recreational pool was maintained for <br />three months; Inflow In John Martin exceeded outflow by 5000 a.r. <br />and was lost to irrigators. Evaporation for 1952 from a 10,000 a.r. <br />recreation pool has been officially calculated at 5100 a.r, Thus the <br />loss In 1952 ""u1d have exceeded the original 10,000 a.r. not taking <br />in consideration loss of sediment. Any of the above years of low <br />now would have equaled or exceeded this amount. <br /> <br />Page 5 <br /> <br />, <br />