Laserfiche WebLink
<br />3 <br /> <br />GLEN CANYON DAM ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM <br /> <br />Project 02 <br /> <br />I. Title: Remove humpback chub from mainstem Colorado River at 30-Mile to <br />maintain genetic stock in refugia. <br /> <br />II. Relationship to Adaptive Management Program, Recovery Goals, and Biological <br />Opinion <br /> <br />Goal 2 in the AMP Strategic Plan (August 17, 200 I) is "Maintain or attain viable <br />populations of existing native fish, remove jeopardy from humpback chub and <br />razorback sucker, and prevent adverse modification to their critical habitat". <br />Management Objective 2.2 is to "Sustain or establish viable HBC spawning <br />aggregations outside the LCR in the Colorado River ecosystem below Glen Canyon <br />Dam to remove jeopardy." <br /> <br />The Adaptive Management Work Group, in their April 24, 2002 meeting, recommended <br />that the Secretary "Initiate all needed activities (consultation [include HBC], <br />compliance, development of a science plan, public outreach, development of a captive <br />breeding population of Grand Canyon Humpback Chub.)" <br /> <br />The Biological Opinion requires a second spawning population of humpback chub (in <br />addition to the Little Colorado River (LCR) aggregation). The 30-Mile aggregation of <br />HBC has been documented to spawn occasionally and young fish have been collected <br />immediately downstream of the 30-Mile location however there appears to be no <br />recruitment to the aggregation. The genetic relationship between the 30-Mile <br />aggregation and the Little Colorado River (LCR) aggregation are unknown. Genetics <br />studies are currently underway (GCMRC), but it is unknown if they will identify any <br />unique characteristics of the 30-Mile fish. <br /> <br />A genetics management plan and refugia plan are desired prior to removal of fish from <br />the wild. However, if the wild stock is only comprised of 50 old adults, and they <br />represent a unique genetic stock, it may be critical to remove fish before a genetics <br />management plan and refugia plan are fully developed. <br /> <br />III. Study Background/Rationale and Hypotheses: <br /> <br />Valdez and Ryel (1995) estimated a population of approximately 52 HBC at 30-Milc, <br />comprised primarily of large (> 350 mm) adults and occasionally young-of-the-year <br />(y.o.y.) fish. Young-of-the-year fish were collected in 1993, 1994, and 1995 between <br />30-Mile and 45-Mile, frequently in a backwater at 44.27 mile (GCMRC unpublished <br />data). These young-of-the-year fish were presumed to have originated from the 30-Mile <br />aggregation. However, juvenile sized fish (> 125 mm to < 330 mm) have not been <br />collected near 30-Mile. The 30-Mile aggregation is likely comprised of old, large adults <br />with little or no recruitment to the spawning population. There is a concern that if the <br />3D-Mile aggregation represents a unique stock offish that are better suited to mainstem <br />spawning they should be protected. If the 30-Mile HBC are not recruiting, natural <br /> <br />Created on 5/6/20035:41 PM <br /> <br />, . <br />