My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP09652
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
WSP09652
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:55:00 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:47:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.765
Description
White River General
State
CO
Basin
Yampa/White
Water Division
6
Date
3/1/1994
Author
USFS
Title
Snowmass Ski Area - Final Environmental Impact Statement - White River National Forest - Aspen Ranger District - Volume I
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
435
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />""~,~,,,>,,.. <br />ii' 'i l'''''''' ::l <br />'_'..., ..~O'!V <br /> <br />gallons (4.6 acre feet) would be necessary for the Dist~ct to be able to meet <br />its needs and supplysnowrnaking water. <br /> <br />spawning and overwintering habitat for brook trout are limiting in Snowrnass <br />Creek. Snowrnakingwithdrawals could reduce brown trout overwintering habitat by <br />greater than 25 percent (a threshold for significant impacts used by the Bureau <br />of Reclamation) for two weeks in Alternatives F and G and for three weeks in <br />Alternative E during a one-in-ten dry year. Brown trout riffle and spawning <br />habitat (used as a surrogate for egg incubation habitat) would not be <br />significantly affected. Brook trout spawning habitat reductions are predicted <br />to reach the significance threshold during a one-in-ten dry year for two weeks <br />in Alternatives Fand G and for five weeks in Alternative E. Flow reductions <br />during a single year may not show measurable effects on the aquatic ecosystem, <br />but recurring annual impacts may have a cumulative adverse effect. <br /> <br />B. WILDLIFE AND BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY <br /> <br />1. Affected Environment <br /> <br />wildlife occurring within the project area and landscape assessment area are <br />representative of habitats present in the Roaring Fork River Valley and are <br />typical of wildlife associations in the central Rocky Mountain valleys of <br />Colorado. No unus1,1al or rare species or groupings of species are known to exist <br />within the project' area (PA) or landscape assessment area (LA). <br /> <br />There are no federally-listed threatened plant or animal species that are known <br />to occur within the PA. Federally-listed endangered species that potentially <br />occur on the LA include: the Colorado squawfish, Humpback chub, bonytail chub, <br />razorback sucker, bald eagle, Mexican spotted owl and peregrine falcon. There <br />are no known federally-listed endangered plants, mammals, reptiles or amphibians <br />within Pitkin County. Lifecycle and other biological information is provided and <br />potential effects to listed species are evaluated in a separate Biological <br />Opinion prepared by the u.s. Fish and Wildlife service (USFWS) on file at the <br />Forest supervisor's Office and included in the project Analysis File. Except for <br />the western boreal toad and northern goshawk, Federal Category 2 candidate <br />species have not been reported to occur and suitable habitat is not present in <br />the LA or PA. <br /> <br />Bier Game <br /> <br />Elk, mule deer, black bear, and bighorn sheep are the big game species of primary <br />concern within the: PA. Elk and deer are the most abundant, although black bear <br />are regularly seen in the area. The size of the MB-SW elk herd is estimated at <br />340 animals. Bighorn sheep are year-round residents of the southern portions of <br />the PA. <br /> <br />Calving habitat may be the most limiting habitat for the elk herd during mild to <br />average winters. 'Historically, elk calving occurred within a 5,700 acre area <br />between the Tiehack Ski Area and the western side of the Snowrnass Ski Area. <br />Development in both of these areas has reduced elk calving to the lower portions <br />of Burnt Mountain and adjacent private lands to the east. Ski area and private <br />land development has resulted in an overall loss of approximately 3,100 acres <br />(54%-) of the calving habitat that waS available prior to development. All <br />indications suggest that as private lands are developed, habitats on NFSL will <br />become incre~singly critical for elk calving. ' <br /> <br />A herd of approximately 40 to 50 elk summers on the eastern edge of the permit <br />area and adjacent private lands. This herd uses the upper portions of the <br />calving habitat and adjacent conifer habitats throughout the summer months. <br />Another herd of sPout the same size summers in the West willow drainage and <br />surrounding area. Approximately l50 to 200 elk summer in the upper reaches of <br />Main willow Creek and adjacent drainages, after migrating through the corridor <br /> <br />Summary . 15 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.