Laserfiche WebLink
<br />,n n ~~. 8 j U <br />,\ 'J _J ..... <br /> <br />II-33 <br /> <br />II-34 <br /> <br />II-35 <br /> <br />II-36 <br /> <br />II-37 <br /> <br />II-38 <br /> <br />II-39 <br /> <br />II-40 <br /> <br />II-41 <br /> <br />II-42 <br /> <br />II-43 <br /> <br />II-44 <br /> <br />II-45 <br /> <br />II-46 <br /> <br />II-47 <br /> <br />II-48 <br /> <br />II-49 <br /> <br />II-50 <br /> <br />II-51 <br /> <br />II-52 <br /> <br />II-53 <br /> <br />II - 54 <br /> <br />Erosion and Geological Hazards by Watershed and Alternative <br />Percentage of Treatments by Wate~shed and Alternative <br />Equivalent Percentage of Watershed Treatments by <br />Watershed and Alternative <br />Increases in Water Yield by Wate~shed and Alternative <br />Wetland Impacts by Watershed and Alternative, Total <br />and Treated Acres Requiring a 404 Permit <br />Total Municipal and Snowrnaking Water Demand and <br />Water Diverted from Snowrnass Creek, October 18 to <br />December 31, by Alternative <br />Snowrnass Creek lOth Percentile Flows for Snowrnaking <br />and Municipal Purposes by Snowrnaking Week, Pump Rate, <br />and by Alternative <br />Reductions in Trout Habitat by Habitat Type and Recurrence <br />Interval Due to Municipal and Snowrnaking Withdrawals From <br />Snowrnass Creek by Alternative <br />Future Net Water Depletions from the Colorado River <br />Drainage for Municipal and Snowrnaking Requirements <br />by Alternative <br />Impacts on Elk Seasonal Habitats Within the LA by Alternative <br />Partial Mitigation and Full Mitigation Scenarios <br />Potential Reductions to the MB-SW Herd by Alternative, <br />Partial Mitigation Scenario <br />Potential Reductions to the MB-SW Herd by Alternative, <br />Full Mitigation Scenario <br />Conversion of Forest Habitats to Man-Made Openings on <br />NFSL within the LA by Alternative <br />Impacts on Biological Diversity On NFSL Within the LA <br />by Alternative <br />Ranking of Impacts on wildlife Seoping Issues by Alternative <br />Vegetation Clearing by VAC and by Alternative <br />vegetation Clearing by IVQO and by Alternative <br />Summary Comparison of Visual Impacts by Analysis <br />Viewpoint and by Alternative <br />Potential Impacts to Known Cultu~al Resources by Alternative <br />Projected Annual Skier Visits by Alternative Under Different <br />Growth Rates <br />Comparison of SAOT Capacity at Varying Utilization Levels <br />by Alternative <br />Comparison of Impacts Colorado Market Share by Alternative, <br />Year 2004 <br />Indirect Impacts to Local Market Skier Visitation <br />by Alternative <br /> <br />II-132 <br /> <br />II-132 <br /> <br /> <br />II-l33 <br /> <br />II-l33 <br /> <br />. II-l34 <br /> <br />. II-l35 <br /> <br />. II-l36 <br /> <br />. II-l37 <br /> <br />. II-l38 <br /> <br />. II-l39 <br /> <br />. II-140 <br /> <br />. II-141 <br /> <br />. II-141 <br /> <br />II-143 <br /> <br />II -144 <br /> <br />II-146 <br /> <br />II-146 <br /> <br />II-l45 <br /> <br />II -14 7 <br /> <br />. II-149 <br /> <br />. II-148 <br /> <br />. II-148 <br /> <br />. II-151 <br />