Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Congressional Appropriations <br />Fiscal Year 1985 <br /> <br />FY 1985 <br /> <br />Total 10 Dale <br /> <br />Appropriation for Construction <br />Basin Fund <br />Recreational Fisll and Wildlife <br />Subtotal <br /> <br />$134,592,704 <br />12,233,737 <br />$1 ~6,826,441 <br /> <br />$1 ,947.053,5~9 <br />148,691,493 <br />$2,095,745,042 <br /> <br />381,357 <br />2,081,773 <br />239,815,500 <br />$2,338,023,672 <br /> <br />Transfers betweon Government Agencies <br />Appropriations to Original Paonia Project <br />Navajo Indian t!!:'92tlon!"rC!.lect...-_ <br />Tolal Congressional Appropriations <br /> <br />8,918,000 <br />$155,744,441 <br /> <br /> <br />, <br />Participants on CentrAl Utal) PrOjCCl Emeflence see Upper Stillwater Dam under construction <br /> <br />at the proposed Last Chance Powerplant <br />to meet project pumping needs. The total <br />construction cost ot the Diamond Fork <br />tacilities under this plan would be approx- <br />imately $210 million, including the cost ot <br />all water conveyance, regulalion, and <br />storage facilities required to accommo- <br />date the transbasin diversion ot Central <br />Utah Project water from the enlarged <br /> <br />Strawberry Reservoir to the contluence of <br />Diamond Fork and the Spalllsh Fork <br />River. <br />In addilion to the 32 megawatts that <br />would be Federally tinanced for project <br />pumping, the potential exists for develop- <br />ment ot an additional 34 megawatts of In- <br />stalled capacity. If non-Federal entities <br />should desire to develop the remaining <br /> <br />capacity In the future. the required faCili- <br />ties would be non-Federally tinanced. <br />Under Ihe current contiguratlon tor the <br />Diamond Fork Power System, the water- <br />ways and storage facilities will need to be <br />constructed at the same size lor both a <br />32-megawatt system and a 66-megawatt <br />system. <br /> <br />The proposed downsized 32-megawatt <br />system was not covered under the 1984 <br />final environmental statement. Reclama- <br />tion.s Upper Colorado Region IS currently <br />working on a supplemental NEPA compli- <br />ance document for the new proposal. <br />This document will be a combined envi- <br />ronmental impact statement for both the <br />Diamond Fork Power System and the <br />Bonneville Unit. The document will meet <br />the NEPA compliance for a full <br />56-megawatt system The final environ- <br />mental statement is scheduled to be tiled <br />In October 1988. <br /> <br />Since the proposed Syar Tunnel in the <br />downsized plan would be identical to the <br />one described in the 1984 finat environ- <br />mental statement, a contract to construct <br />a Syar access road could be awarded in <br />fiscal year 1987 and a construction con- <br />Iract for Syar Tunnel could be awarded in <br />fiscal year 1988. Relcamatlon has already <br />complied with NEPA tor these facifities <br />under the existing environmental state- <br />ment. <br /> <br />The second stage of the Glen Canyon <br />Environmental Studies is underway. The <br />objectives of the studies are to define the <br />impact of Glen Canyon Dam operations <br />on the natural environment of the Grand <br />Canyon and, if significant adverse im- <br />pacts are occurring, to identify alternative <br />operating criteria for Glen Canyon Dam <br />that could lessen these impacts and opti- <br />mize the relationship between water <br />released and the environment. The <br />studies are a cooperative effort between <br />the Bureau of Reclamation and the Na- <br />tional Park Service, with the Bureau of <br />Reclamation providing the overall study <br />management and funding. Other agencies <br />and groups providing technical expertise <br />Include the U.S. Geological Survey, U.S. <br />Fish and Wildlife Service, Arizona Game <br />and Fish Department, commercial river <br />operators, recreation consultants, eco- <br />nomic consultants, and other interested <br />indiViduals <br /> <br />5 <br />