Laserfiche WebLink
<br />WATER RE'SOURCEl DEVEWPMENT PROGRAMS' <br /> <br />L~~;:~) <br /> <br />002396 <br /> <br />.;.>t:'-:~~~. <br />.. . ~ <br /> <br />15 <br /> <br />.",-,,,, <br /> <br />In an attempt to overcome the first of these deficiencies a system of canals <br />which provide east-west links between the north-south rivers of European <br />Russia has been developed over the years. With the completion of the V olga- <br />Don Canal in 1952 it is now possible to go by barge from the Baltic to the Caspian <br />Sea. The Soviets have been disappointed with the slow growth of traffic on the <br />V<>>lga-Don Canal and its failure t<>> relieve the overloaded railroads. <br />Bulk freight on rivers and canals was distributed in 1956 as follows: <br /> <br />[In tons] <br /> <br />Petroleum_____________._________ 10. 2 CoaL_________________. _________ 6. 0 <br />Timber________________._________ 49.3 BuildIng materials_____.._________ 23.1 <br />Grain_________________._________ 3. 8 Miscellaneous___________________ 6. 2 <br /> <br />SaIL__________________._________ 1. 4 <br />TABLE 4.-U. H. S. R.-Inland. water transport <br /> <br /> Length of Total freight Total freight Passenger Traffic <br />Year waterways turnover tonnage (million (million <br /> (thousand (million ton- (million passenger. persons) <br /> kilometers) kilometers) tons) kilometers) <br />1928 _ _ __ _ _____ __ ______ _ mm ____ 71.6 15.9 18.3 2.1 17.8 <br />1940___>_________________________ 107.3 35.9 72.9 3.8 73.0 <br />1950_____________________________ 130.2 45.9 91. 5 2.7 53.6 <br />1955_______________>____>________ 131.9 67.4 139.1 3.6 82.4 <br />1956_ ___________________,________ 132.0 70.2 146.8 3.5 81. 7 <br /> <br />Source: Sta.tistical Han(.ibook of the U. S. S. R. in 1956 (Narodnoe Khozyaistvo S. S. S. R.IQ56), Moscow, <br />1957. <br /> <br />In consultation with the Corps of Engineers, corresponding U. S. <br />ton-mile and U. S. total tonnage figures on.U.S. waterways for cor- <br />responding years were found. Calculated and corrected for the dif- <br />ferent units of distance and weight involved, it was found that on a <br />ton-mile basis in the 38'year recent span, the U. S. inland waterway <br />ton-mile figure rose 2.3 times contrasted to a Soviet increase of 4.4 <br />times, and ill the same period, while U. S. total inland water-haul traffic <br />total tonnage was approximately doubling, Soviet total toimage multi- <br />plied 8.2 times. <br /> <br />r'<<~Jj5'-,:"", ..,..!f,J".,., <br /> <br />COMMENT OF CIDEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY <br /> <br />Maj. Gen. E. C. Itschner, Chief of Engineers, U. S.Army, on <br />December 5, 1957, at New Orleans, before the Mississippi Valley F~ood <br />Control Association, made a public report embracing certain of the <br />Army's information on the relative J?ositions of the U. S. S. R. and <br />U. S. in river development falling WIthin the corps' authority. The <br />chief of Engineers emphasized Russian progress in hydroelectric and <br />inland water transport and gave as his opinion, the view: <br /> <br />We would be very negligent if we did not build up our national economy so <br />as to be in abetter position to.support a greater military effort in advance of the <br />possible initiation of war. It follows that now, more than ever before, as part of <br />our national improvement program, we should develop our water resources" " ". <br />Thus, to my mind, the new era of military preparedness encompasses a new natu- <br />ral resource development age which is an integral part of what must be OUr broad <br />program to meet the severe demands of national preservation. <br /> <br />SOVIET RUSSIA'S FLOOD CONTROL <br /> <br /> <br />The U. S. S. R. has an unemphasized flood-control program on <br />which sufficient data is not easily available or at least not located, <br />to attempt a fruitful presentation of the type requested in the instruc- <br />