Laserfiche WebLink
<br />o 0 2 7 ~) 3 <br /> <br />18 <br /> <br />WATER <br /> <br />Section 8 addresses water and water resource facilities. Sub- <br />section 8(a) recites findings upon which the section is based, states <br />the section's purpose, and provides a definition of the term "water <br />resource facility" as used in the section. <br />As stated in the findings, section 8 is entirely premised on cer- <br />tain specific characteristics of the lands designated as wilderness <br />by section 2(a) of the bill, namely- <br />(1) these lands are located at the headwaters of the streams <br />and rivers located on those lands, with few if any opportunities <br />for diversion, storage, or other uses of water that could occur <br />outside these areas that would adversely affect the wilderness <br />values of the areas; <br />(2) these lands are not suitable for use for development of <br />new water resource facilities or the expansion of existing water <br />resource facilities; and <br />(3) therefore, proper management and protection of the wil- <br />derness values of the specific areas covered by section 2(a) can <br />be provided for in ways different from those employed with re- <br />gard to wilderness lands lacking these particular attributes. <br />This being the case, section 8 is intended to protect the wilder- <br />ness values of the lands described in section 2(a) by means other <br />than those based on assertion of Federal reserved water rights. <br /> <br />RESTRICTION <br /> <br />Subsection 8(b)(1) would prohibit any person (including the Sec- <br />retary of Agriculture or any other person) from acting as the agent <br />of the United States in asserting in any court or agency any claim <br />for water or water rights in Colorado based on construing any por- <br />tion of the bill (or the designation by the bill of any lands as wil- <br />derness) as constituting either an express or implied reservation of <br />water or water rights. It also would deny any court or agency any <br />statutory jurisdiction to consider any such claim: a restriction en- <br />compassing any jurisdiction otherwise available under any Act of <br />Congress. (Of course, nothing in this Act could have the effect of <br />altering the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of the Unit- <br />ed States under clause 2 of section 2 of Article III of the Constitu- <br />tion, which could be altered or restricted only through an amend- <br />ment of the Constitution itself). <br />The effect of enactment of paragraph 8(b)(1) will be to deny any- <br />one (including but not limited to a person holding an established <br />office of the national government) the authority to assert on behalf <br />of the United States, and to deny a court or agency any statutory <br />jurisdiction to consider, a claim that the bill's designation as wil- <br />derness of the lands described in section 2(a) has the effect of re- <br />serving to the United States any water or water right with respect <br />to those lands. The scope and applicability of paragraph 8(b)(1) has <br />been carefully limited in order that the withdrawal of statutory ju- <br />risdiction over a particular t) }'6 Df claim will in all othei' l'eSpeChi <br />leave completely undisturbed the general body of law (including the <br />so-called "McCan-an amen.dment", 68 Stat. 5480; 43 D.S.C. 666) 1''0- <br />garding the jurisdictions of U.S. and State courts and agencies with <br />r:ospect to water, <br />