Laserfiche WebLink
<br />OUTLINlJ; OF PROCEDURE FOR DETERMINATION OF <br />WRm RlVER BASIN DRAINAGE AREAS <br /> <br />I. Establishment of watershed boundaries. <br /> <br />, <br />a. Tentative watershed boundaries were sketohed on Corps of Engineers and .j <br />Department of Agrioulture photographio indexes by inepection and by <br />reference to the best available maps. Reference was made to the White <br />River Valley Survey, Cotter to Batesvllle, Arkansas, and to s:llll1lar <br />Corps of Engineers I maps of reservoir areas, as well as to the Mississippi <br />River COJlIIIlission quadrangles, U.S.G.S. quadrangle maps, and county maps. <br /> <br />b. Full size aerial photographs covering the tentatiVe watershed boundary <br />were examined stereosoopically to determine the definite location of the <br />boundary . <br /> <br />c. Concurrent~ with the stereoscopic examination, the tentative watershed <br />boundary previous~ sketched on the mosdo index was adJusted as re- <br />quired to represent the final watershed,boundary. <br /> <br />2 . Breakdown of Areas. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Watersheds were determined, as indicated in pare.graph 1 above, for <br />the main stem 01' the White River, from its mouth to its source, and <br />for major and ll11nortributaries and their tributaries or subareas <br />for dam sites, ge.ging stations, etc. <br /> <br />3. Determination of Drainage Areas. <br /> <br />a. Quadrilaterale 01' l-ll11nute latitude and longitude were plotted on the <br />aerial mosaic along the previously determined watershed boundaries. <br /> <br />b . Base maps, each oonsisting of a 60 by 6o-ll11uute projection were pre- <br />pared 1'01' transfer of watershed boundaries 1'rom the aerial mosaic. <br />The projections, scale IIJ25 ,000, were divided into 5-ll11nute quadri- <br />laterals and further subdivided into l-l!1inute quadrilaterals. <br /> <br />c. The l:llll1ting boundaries of all drainage areas and subareas were trans- <br />ferred from the aerial lDflsaics to the ll125,OOO base maps in prepara- <br />tion for the cOIIqlutation of drainage area values. <br /> <br />d. Values of each l-ll11uute quadrilateral were determined; mathelDll.tically <br />by referenoe to published tables of latitude and longitude values. <br />Along waterehed boundaries thepercentege of a quadrilateral within <br />a particular drainage area was determined by use of' a planimeter. <br />This percentage applied against the mathematioal value of the eutire <br />quadrilateral furnished the desired figure for use in cOIIqlilatiou of <br />the over-all value for the area or subarea. <br /> <br />D <br />