Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ ~J :.:~ :j ".Y,1 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Municipal and Industrial Water Requirements <br /> <br />Generally, large urban centers, such as Denver, expand <br />concentrically. Historically, this type of growth has occurred in <br />the Denver metropolitan area. Visually, it can be noted that the <br />northern portion of this concentric movement in the Denver area is <br />not complete. Should this historical pattern of expansion continue, <br />completing the outer periphery, large portions of Boulder, Weld, and <br />Adams Counties would realize considerable growth in the near future. <br />It ap!iears from the data analyzed thus far that the northern portion <br />of the circle is being completed. There are, however, certain barriers <br />which will prevent the Denver area from expanding much further <br />concentrically. The main barrier is the foothills lying west of the <br />area. This barrier will undoubtedly force population growth into the <br />other three directions. However, the Rocky Mountain Arsenal is also <br />a barrier to the east which will set certain limits for population <br />expansion in that direction. Ultimate expansion probably will be <br />toward the north and south~ <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The population projections made by the Inter-County Regional <br />Planning Commission and conclusions reached in this analysis concerning;: <br />future population growth in the St. Vrain Creek basin should be . <br />adequate for reconnaissance estimates. Recently, however, a more <br />intensive population study associated with the Comprehensive Framework " <br />Study of the Missouri River Basin, Platte Subregion, has been made fo~ <br />the 5-county Denver Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area. :tn that <br />analysis, the projected population for the Denver SMSA was 1,810,000 <br />for 1980, 3,059,000 for 2000, and 5,015,000 for 2020. These projec- <br />tions are somewhat in excess of those made by the Inter-County Regional <br />Planning Commission, but they do not invalidate the projections for <br />Boulder C01lllllty for 1980 and 2000 shown in table 12, <br /> <br />DETERMINATION OF M&I WATER REQutREMENTS <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Future municipal and industrial water supplies will be composed :; <br />of , the existing supplies plus those obtained from new sources. Estimatin~ <br />the demand that will be placed on new supplies is complicated by the fac~ <br />that the historic yield from existing water rights will not remain the <br />same under future demand conditions. Also, per capita requirements at " <br />least in the short run, are influenced by the economic cost of water. <br />Long-term trends, however, show an increase in per capita requirements <br />which is brought about by higher standards of living, improved sani taw <br />facilities, and greater industrial activity. To simplify the .determina- <br />tion of future municipal and industrial water requirements, it was <br />assumed that future increases in per capita requirements by the existing' <br /> <br />35 <br /> <br />l -..,L ;.,,-,-~~,,~~~,'~'''~ ]:~.;,~-', ~\,:t<,iS"L. ;~"_'- <br /> <br /> <br />'I <br />