Laserfiche WebLink
<br />o <br /> <br />'i <br />:'r <br />ij <br /> <br />(.::> <br />(-.:> <br />,! ....<I <br />.-4 <br />':) <br />~ "'.:) <br /> <br />reasonable administrative and physical safeguards should be built into each <br />project, where feasible, to reduce any damage to a minimum. <br /> <br />The objective of all of the recommended projects is to increase the delivery of <br />water across the State Line to satisfy the requirements of the Rio Grande ~ompact <br />in exchange for increased diversions': from direct river flow princip~lly for <br />irrigation purposes. Hopefully the increased diversions will maintain recharge <br />to the drainage projects so that diversions can'be continued year after yea~, ' <br />this mayor may not be a valid conclusion. <br /> <br />It should be evident that before a thorough examination and evaluation of <br />possible projects and assignment of reasonable priorities can be made, financing <br />is needed for engineering, legal and administrative studies. Although it is nbt <br />listed as a project, a long range master plan is a very necessary part of any <br />undertaking as extensive as water salvage within the Colorado portion of the <br />Rio Grande basin. The budgeting of finances should allow for aufficient funds of <br />high priority to permit adequate prior and continual planning. <br /> <br />The ideas and recommendations enumerated apparently represent the thinking of <br />the Board of Directors and also a considerable portion of the more ~ire~tly ef- <br />fected residents of the San Luis Valley. The projects seem reasonable ,nd log- <br />ical on the basis of what has been done to date. It is conceivable that new <br />projects may be uncovered and some of the initial ideas rejected or 'modified as <br />a result of more detailed studies. <br /> <br />QUESTION OF RESPONSIBILITY <br /> <br />Colorado is now faced with the alternatives of meeting the demands o,f the <br />Compact or defending itself against a suit brought by the State of Texas and <br />New Mexico. If C'olorado's 1968 administrative policies are continueld ihthe <br />absence of compensatory relief measures, the welfare of the San Luis, Va~ley <br />residents and San Luis Valley economy are destined to 'suffer. According to <br />recent studies and considerable publicity, the San Luis Valley, generally <br />speaking, is an economically'depressed area '~en without the loss of its <br />water. <br /> <br />All of the projects aswell as the planning and the administration of any' <br />projects require finances before any significant results can be obtained. <br />Enough is known that the Norton Drain and possibly some channelization <br />could be completed before the next irrigation season if funds were immediately <br />available. <br /> <br />The Rio Grande Compact was made by the State of Colorado and is an obligation <br />thereof. The State of Colorado also granted water rights to its citizens prior <br />and subsequent to ratification of the Compact. Since ratification of the Com- <br />pact, Colorado for the most part has not administered the water in the rivers <br />in accordance with the Compact requirements 'until 1968, approximately 100 years <br />after the first appropriations of Rio Grande and Conejos River water. During <br />the last 100 years much money, time and energy have been invested in the San <br />Luis Valley on the basis of Colorado's history of permitting diversions of <br />water from the rivers. <br />