Laserfiche WebLink
<br />SUMMARY <br /> <br />Wildlife <br />(Page C-50 of FES) <br /> <br />Modifications to the M&I System plan would eliminate an additional <br />160 acres of wildlife habitat beyond the 3,496 acres documented in the <br />FES. Temporary disturbance of habitat would increase by about 132 acres <br />above the previously documented 799 acres. These losses, in addition to <br />added indirect impacts, would cause increased losses of mule deer, elk, <br />sage grouse, and other wildlife species in the Jordanelle area. The <br />relocation of U.S. Highway 189 and construction of the new county road, <br />along with anticipated private land development along the highways, <br />would create an additional barrier for migrating deer and elk. The U.S. <br />Highway 189 relocation would also traverse sage grouse brood-rearing <br />areas and a portion of the West Hills nesting area, resulting in a net <br />loss of 12 acres and disturbance impacts on about 80 acres. <br /> <br />Wildlife Losses <br />. <br /> <br />Approximately 66 percent of the mule deer losses would result from <br />barrier effects created by the new reservoir, inundation of 100 acres of <br />severe winter range, and reservoir crossing fatalities (drowning or ice <br />injuries). The remaining 34 percent of the losses would result from the <br />barrier effects of the highway relocations accompanied by increased <br />highway mortalities (road kills). <br /> <br />Since the 1979 FES, an elk herd of about 30 animals has become <br />established in the West Hills located west of Kamas, Utah. Elk losses, <br />including an occasional road kill, would result entirely from the bar- <br />rier effect from the relocation of U.S. Highway 189. Mitigation for elk <br />would also be accomplished through the Wildlife Mitigation Plan. <br /> <br />About 37 percent of the sage grouse losses would be caused by inun- <br />dation of 110 acres of breeding and nesting habitat. The remainder (63 <br />percent) would be caused by highway relocations through important breed- <br />ing, nesting, and brooding habitats. <br /> <br />The table below summarizes the impacts expected from road reloca- <br />tions on the key wildlife species--deer, elk, and sage grouse. <br /> <br />Wildlife <br />Annual <br />1979 plan <br />Percent <br />of total <br />Number population Number <br />11186 41 194 <br />o 0 3 <br />grouse 52 4 109 <br />1/ The FES stated a loss of 240 deer. <br />by the Fish and Wildlife Service Coordination <br />deer. <br /> <br />impacts <br />loss <br />1986 <br /> <br />plan <br />Percent <br />of total Net difference <br />population Number Percent <br />43 -8 -2 <br />10 -3 -10 <br />9 -57 -5 <br />This was later corrected <br />Act Report (1979) to 186 <br /> <br />Species <br />Mule deer <br />Elk <br />Sage <br /> <br />S-14 <br />