Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I' <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />n~~~~' <br />U~U_J~ <br /> <br />CONCLUSIONS <br /> <br />The Phase I Drought Study led to the following conclusions: <br /> <br />o The City will become increasingly vulnerable to drought conditions <br />as the population increases. <br /> <br />o Loveland will become increasingly dependent upon the CBT Project to <br />meet demand during the November through March period. <br /> <br />o The increased dependency on CBT water to meet demands will increase <br />the vulnerability of the City's supply to transmission capacity <br />limitations or temporary disruptions in the CBT delivery system <br />(e.g., Adams Tunnel, Dille Tunnel, Charles Hansen Feeder Canal). <br /> <br />o A significant volume of water that is owned by the City through <br />ownership in ditch companies is returned to the river during wet <br />years due to the present lack of city-owned storage capacity. <br /> <br />o The City's projected water supply will be sufficient to meet demand <br />at the 25-, 50-, 100- and 2000-year drought recurrence intervals for <br />the 1985, 2000-low. 2000-moderate and 2015-low growth scenarios. <br /> <br />o Vater supply deficits would be encountered during 100- and 200-year <br />droughts for the 2000-high growth scenario. <br /> <br />o Vater supply surpluses would be available for the 2000-high growth <br />scenario during 25- and 50-year drought events. <br /> <br />o Vater supply deficits would be encountered during the 25-, 50-, 100- <br />and 200-year drought events for the 2015-moderate and 2015-high <br />growth scenarios. <br /> <br />To achieve the reliability and yields predicted herein without additional <br />storage capacity, it will be essential to acquire additional CBT shares <br />and ownership in ditch companies (through annexation of currently <br />undeveloped land) in the amounts anticipated by the Vater Board. <br /> <br />A variety of alternative drought mitigation strategies were examined to <br /> <br />provide a preliminary evaluation of their effectiveness in reducing or <br /> <br />eliminating the deficits encountered under the 2015-moderate growth <br /> <br />scenario for the 100-year recurrence interval. These evaluations led to <br /> <br />the overall conclusion that sufficient water can be made available to <br /> <br />eliminate the deficits encountered under that scenario: <br /> <br />iv <br />