My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP09398
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
WSP09398
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:53:21 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:36:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8507
Description
Rio Grande Project
State
CO
Basin
Rio Grande
Date
7/1/1997
Title
Water Management Study: Upper Rio Grande Basin part 3
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Conclusions and Recommendations <br /> <br />~~", <br />.,..' <br />'.~ <br />'.', , <br /> <br />constraints, themselves, be adjusted so that the management agencies better <br />internalize into their operational decisionmaking all the economic <br />consequences of their operations. This is not to say that Congress should <br />change the statutory authorizations to eliminate all preferences or <br />undermine contractual obligations built on past authorization language. <br />Instead, we recommend that Congress specify economic and ecosystem goals <br />for the Basin, identify priorities for how the facilities should contribute to the <br />attainment of these goals, and give the agencies greater leeway to work <br />toward them. <br /> <br />3. Support Institutional Innovations that Promote Competition <br /> <br />:;; <br /> <br />We anticipate there will be many efforts in this Basin over the next few <br />years, and certainly over the next few decades, to develop institutional <br />innovations to facilitate voluntary transfers of resources from low-value to <br />high-value uses. We recommend that federal agencies in the Basin support <br />these efforts insofar as they are likely to effect true progress toward <br />competitive ideals. Ai; a necessary step, agencies must, themselves, become <br />more innovative and gain a better ability to evaluate the likelihood that <br />specific institutional proposals will bear desired fruit. <br /> <br />{~ <br />"~~ <br /> <br />I' :.; <br />.> <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />We believe all the preceding recommendations are consistent with and will <br />facilitate making progress with respect to this one. Eventually, ecological <br />and economic imperatives will prove to all parties, federal or otherwise, the <br />importance of taking an ecosystem-management approach to ensuring that <br />management of the Basin's resources accomplish both environmental and <br />economic goals. To the extent that federal agencies get out ahead of others, <br />they will have opportunities to serve as catalysts for institutional change up <br />and down the valley. The assessment of ecological and economic conditions <br />in the Basin, together with the setting of priorities will help individual <br />agencies evaluate the merits of specific proposals. <br /> <br />~.; <br />'." <br /> <br />.., <br /> <br />-.- <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />One innovation already here is the water bank being proposed by the Middle <br />Rio Grande Conservancy District. Before a federal agency provides material <br />support to this proposal, it should determine the likelihood that the bank <br />will facilitate voluntary transfer of water to highest-value uses. If, however, <br />the agency determines the bank is likely to raise the hurdle "buyers" and <br /> <br />(,~~3~19 <br /> <br />139 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.