WSP09344 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

e e e 00 \ \ ~ '6 Sllb-adi.fl.t:v:" Il P - During this dub-activity the COWlcil reque~t3 thJ.t 23 for national co;;istency the types of Effects information shown in Fieur.e 5 be developed in all region~ for each Problem contained on the final Problem list using the selected analytical areas. The Council also suggests that the Regional Sponsor add other Effects information to this list -- those necessary in the opinion of the Regional Sponsor to fully des cribe the severity of the Problems contained in th.e final Problem list. The effects information should be taken from existing reports and ongoing studies to the extent possible. The responsibility for doing this sub- activity is as discus sed in the beginning portion of this entire Activity. (Part :Jf Gr:Jup A plus contractual assistancei Sub-activity 12 - During this sub-activity the Regional Study Director assisted by his staff or a work group (part of Group A) will evaluate the information developed in Sub-activity 11 and define a proposed set of poteCltial Level B Study Area !which mayor may not coincide identically with individual or groups of Problem Areas. For example, as shown in Figure 6, it may be desirable to combine t'1/O or more noncontiguous ,Problem Areas into a single Level B Study Area. Therefor~, the areal extent of a Level B Study Area may be greater than the areal extent of the Problem Areas within it. The- ~.....uc tt true for the AnalYtical Areas developed for the purpose of presenting the Effects information listed in Figure 5. That is, the Ana- lytical Areas which approximate the Problem Areas may have to be modified in order to provide the best possible data base for describing information for the Level B Studv Area_ Sub-activity 13 - During this sub-activity the Council requests that for national consistency the types of Effects information shown in Figure 5 be developed in all regions for each proposed potential Level B Study Area using t:l):e associated Analytical Areas selected in Sub-activity 12. This Effects information is the same as that developed in Sub-activity 11. The only difference between the two sub-activities, therefore, is the simple fact that the size of the area for which information is developed may increase. U", for example, a proposed Level B Study Area coincides with a Problem Area, there is no need to develop additional Eff.ects information. The responsibility for doing this work is a3 described in the beginning portion of this entire Activity (part of Groap A plus con- tractual assistance), Sub-activity 14 - During this sub-activity, the Regional Sponsor will document in final form, for each ASA, Problem Area, the Level B Study Area, differences between Effects information related to the Modifi.ed Central Case and th.e Regional Preference Future. This sub-activity is closely related to Sub-activity Eight where differences between the two futures aIs" were docUInented. The Study Director, assisted by his staff or a small work group (the same group used in Sub-activity Eight) will be responsible for documenting these differences in a technical memorandum to the WRC and the Specific Problem Analysts Report.