Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />COLqRADO R1VER BTORAGID ~ROJECT <br /> <br />4. The statement tejects the proposal of the privately owned utili. <br />ties of the area for t)le construction of the greater part of the trans- <br />mission system sayillg that "an analysis would more heavily favor all <br />Federal constrnction in that the power allocation irrigation allo. <br />cation would be repaid in less time and the irrigation assistance would <br />,be aVf\ili1blef\t an earlier date and'in larger quantities" uhdeJ.'the <br />proposal of ,the priY'tte utilities. " ' <br />5. ThereclamatioiJ., proposal approv, ed, by former Se,cretf\ryS,eaton <br />'provides for selling power at 6 miUsunder Federal construc,tion of the <br />transmission systeIDi as compared with 6,57 'mills nnder the utility <br />proposal.: ,,' <br /> <br />Appropriations proposed in budget'for Colorado River storage' project and participat.. <br />, ingpriJject. for fiscal year 196~ <br />Project: i F/8calyear JoO! <br />Curecanti unit, Colorado__________________________________ $4,557,000 <br />Flaming'Gorge unIt, Utah-Wyoming________________________ 11,741,000 <br />Glen Canyon unit} Arizona..Utah;._...___......_~__.._____.._hn___ 39,825,740 <br />Navajo unit, NewiMexico...._.._________.._.._______.._______.... 4,980,000 <br />Transmisl',IiQu divi$ion___..____....._.--..-....-----.---...--..----..-..- 8,673,000 <br />Participating proifots: ,. <br />, Central Utah, Vernal umt, Utah________"____,___________ 1,083,000 <br />Florida, Col~J.-----------------------c---------------- 2,777,000 <br />Hammond, 1". Mex___....___..____..___n__..______..__,___.. 1,334,000 <br />Paonia, Colol;________________________________~______ 330,000 <br />Seedskadee, Wy9R~__~~~_________~------R-------R-.--- 5,711,000 <br />Smith ]fork, Oolo_..___..:________n__________._:----R----_ 2,027,000 <br />Advanceplanning___________..____~----_-----------..--..--_ 1,179,000 <br /> <br />Total (includin~ carryover)_"____________________________ 84, 217, 740 <br /> <br />ESTfMATED COST OF OVE&ALL PROJECT <br /> <br />The estimated eonstruction cost of the Colorado River storage <br />. project including participating projects as set forth in the report on <br />S. 500, 84th Congt'ess, lst session, $1,658,460,100. The construction <br />and operation anCl! maintenance authorized by Public Law 485, 84th <br />Congress, 2d sessicin is $760 million. <br />, This authorizedi total includes Glen Canyon Dam and powerplant, <br />Flaming Gorge Dam and powerplant, Curecanti dams and power. <br />plant, and the N~vajostorage reservoir. Pf\rticipating projects au, <br />thorized inclnde Central ptah (initial phase), Emery County, Florida, <br />Hammond, La Barge, Lyman, Paonia (including Minnesota unit, etc., <br />and other necessa)ry works), Pine River extension, Seedskadee, Silt, <br />and Smith Fork. i Other participating projects and additional features <br />which are include<il in the estimated overall costs of $1,658,460,100 are <br />subject to furthe~ authorization by the Congress before construction <br />begms. ; <br />The constrnctiQn contemplated in the $760 million authorized limi- <br />tation includes the three power projects-Glen Canyon, Flaming <br />Gorge, and CureQanti-the Navajo Dam storage project, and certain <br />participating units. The estimated cost of the ,transmission system' <br />approximates $1$0 million which with related transmission facilities <br />may run the tota~ cost of the transmission to more than $200 million. <br /> <br />