My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP09261
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
WSP09261
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:52:23 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:33:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8131.400
Description
Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
12/21/1967
Author
SEWCD
Title
Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors - December 21 1967
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Board Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />o <br /><:") <br /> <br />~ few other smaller canals likewise elected not to be brought into the District <br />en <br />Wand accordingly was left out. Hence the irrigated area below John Martin <br /> <br />Dam and in the vicinity of Lamar and east to the state line is not at present <br /> <br />a part of the District. Had Lamar elected to become a part of the District, <br /> <br />such election would not have had any effect on increasing the sources of <br /> <br />water supply of the Fryingpan Project. <br /> <br />FINANCING <br /> <br />By rejecting its opportunity, Lamar has avoided a levy of 4/1 Oths of <br /> <br />one mill on its assessed valuation which is currently approximately <br /> <br />$9,000,000. Had Lamar paid taxes the same as every other city in the <br /> <br />District and had the District saved the monies so collected and invested <br /> <br />them at an average yield of 4. 50/. which is approximately our average <br /> <br />interest return over the yea:t's, the District would today be $35,000 better <br /> <br />. off, or stated conversely, Lamar should pay to the District $35,000 if <br /> <br />the District is not to subsidize Lamar. <br /> <br />DffiECTORS <br /> <br />The state law permits a maximum of 15 directors for a water con- <br /> <br />servancy district and the Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy <br /> <br />District is in turn divided into eight subdistricts, to which subdistricts <br /> <br />the directors are allotted. If Lamar or the area abutting Lamar comes <br /> <br />into the District, presumably it would be attached to the closest area and <br /> <br />the same director would represent that area. Other alternatives are that <br /> <br />the Colorado state statutes be amended or the entire board of directors <br /> <br />-3- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.