Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Oan3?U <br /> <br />3.3.3 Scenario No.3 <br /> <br />Scenario No.3 is the same as Scenario No.2 with the addition of Powder Wash <br /> <br /> <br />Project. The Powder Wash Project water rights are junior to the subject rights included <br /> <br />in Scenario No.2. Scenario No.3 output was compared with Scenario No.2 output to <br /> <br />determine the incremental impacts of Little Snake Reservoir and Powder Wash Power <br /> <br />Plant. Results are presented in Section 4.0. <br /> <br />3.3.4 Scenario No.4 <br /> <br />Under Scenario No.4, the Little Snake River Basin was modeled with the addition <br /> <br />of only the Three Forks Project to the Water Development Baseline. Impacts due to <br /> <br />Three Forks Reservoir alone were determined by comparing Scenario No.4 output to the <br /> <br />Water Development Baseline output. <br /> <br />3.3.5 Scenario No.5 <br /> <br />This scenario included the addition of the Powder Wash Project only to the Water <br /> <br />Development Baseline. Impacts due to the Powder Wash Project alone were determined <br /> <br />by comparing Scenario No.5 output to the Water Development Baseline output. <br /> <br />35 <br />