Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />, I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />000339 <br /> <br />additional release from Three Forks ReseIVoir will be made, up to a total of 52 cfs. <br /> <br />Instream flow requirements, other than that required for Savery Creek, have not been <br /> <br />quantified by biological studies and have been estimated for study purposes only. <br /> <br />3.3 MODELING SCENARIOS <br />Various project scenarios were modeled using WIRSOS for the 1930-1982 period <br /> <br />to determine the impact of these scenarios upon downstream flows. Five development <br /> <br />scenarios were selected for evaluation. <br /> <br />3.3.1 Scenarios No.1. IA and IB <br /> <br />Under Scenario Nos. 1, IA and IB, the Little Snake River Basin was modeled with <br /> <br /> <br />the addition of the Pot Hook Project to the Water Development Baseline. WIRSOS <br /> <br /> <br />output from these Scenarios were compared to the Water Development Baseline to <br /> <br /> <br />determine Pot Hook Project impacts upon the system. Results are discussed in Section <br />4.0. <br /> <br />3.3.2 Scenario No.2 <br /> <br />Scenario No.2 is the same as Scenario No.1 with the addition of the consolidated <br /> <br />Three Forks ReseIVoir Project to the system. All Three Forks water rights are junior to <br /> <br />the Pot Hook rights modeled in Scenario No. I. Scenario No.2 output was compared <br /> <br />with that of Scenario No. I to determine the incremental impacts of Three Forks. Results <br /> <br />are presented in Section 4.0. <br /> <br />34 <br />