WSP09218

• File Number: 8200.765
• Description: Little Snake River General
• State: CO
• Basin: Yampa/White
• Water Division: 6
• Date: 7/31/1990
• Author: Western Water Consul
• Title: Final Report on Little Snake River Depletions by Pot Hook - Three Forks - and Powder Wash Rights
• Water Supply Pro - Doc Type: Report/Study

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

000359

TABLE 3. SUMMARY OF WIRSOS INPUT FOR POT HOOK PROJECf

'I

Pot Hook Reservoir Data
Storage right, priority date of 6-5-59 (73,580 AF)
Enlargement right, priority date of 4-19-66 (100,000 AF)
Minimum storage volume
Maximum storage volume (Scenarios 1 and lA)
Maximum storage volume (Scenario IB)
Maximum primary outlet capacity to Slater Creek
Initial storage volume at beginning of
study period (70% Total) (Scenarios 1 and lA)
Initial storage volume at beginning of
study period (70% Total) (Scenario lB) 70,000 AF
Area - Capacity relationship (as developed by USBR) (See Appendix C)

=

60,000 AF
OAF
34,000 AF
60,000 AF
100,000 AF
1,000 cfs

=

=

=

=

=

=

42,000 AF

Instream Flow
Instream flow requirements in Slater Creek below dam

=

24 cfs

Irril!ation Diversion Data
Pot Hook Canal (canal capacity = 290 cfs)
Diversion right, priority date of 6-5-59, (260 cfs)
Enlargement right, priority date of 4-19-66 (400 cfs)
Two Bar Canal:
Diversion right, priority date of 6-5-59

=

260 cfs
30 cfs

=

=

100 cfs

Boone Lateral:
Diversion right, priority date of 6-5-59

=

16 cfs

Deer Lodge Lateral:
Diversion right, priority date of 6-5-59

=

23 cfs

Demand Schedule:
U.S.B.R. Diversion Demand Schedule

Irrigation Use Efficiencies and Return Flow Schedules:
Same as Water Development Baseline

For Scenario 1 the Two Bar Canal and Boone and Deer Lodge Laterals call upon storage
in Pot Hook Reservoir if direct flows are insufficient to meet demand.

For Scenarios lA and IB the Two Bar Canal and Boone and Deer Lodge Laterals
received direct flows only, they were not permitted to call on Pot Hook Reservoir
storage.

24