Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br />,~ <br />i~ <br /> <br />~p <br /> <br />if <br /> <br />"1 J <br />r~ <br />)If <br /> <br />0270 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Change in real estate values <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Change in propeny tax collections <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Change in agribusiness sales (equipment, seed, fertilizer, fuel) <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Change in sales tax collections <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Impact of alternative uses of water on economic activity, e.g., industrial production, use in <br />recreation (hunting, fishing, boating) based tourism <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Invesanent in constrUction within the impact area, e.g. for canal lining <br /> <br />The economic impact of each alternative will be estimated by tracing the changes in baseline economic <br />conditions of the impact area. This will involve measuring changes in basic sector production and <br />detennining economic impacts (multiplier effects) on the service sector, estimating changes in <br />employment, by type and sector, on wholesale and retail sales, and on sales tax collections. Changes <br />in real estate values will be traced through their impacts on property tax collections. Changes in <br />propeny tax collections will result in financial impacts on the governmental sector, including <br />employment. <br /> <br />Sociological impacts are largely a consequence of economic changes in this case. Sociological impacts <br />for each alternative will be estimated by comparing the economic changes identified with known social <br />patterns observed in previous studies. Significant sociaVpsychological impacts will be identified and <br />discussed. <br /> <br />Environmental Impacts and Mitigation <br /> <br />Environmental impacts of land dry-up are one of the major concerns in regard to water transfers as <br />evidenced by litigation and court action involving ~ of lands under the Colorado Canal and <br />Rocky Ford Ditch. Land stabilization, control of blowing dust, and reduction of nuisance and noxious <br />weeds are required. <br /> <br />~t <br /> <br />In recent years, fanners and other observers have been severely critical and vocal in regard to <br />agricultural procedures practiced in the revegetation process on lands under the Rocky Ford ditch. <br />Most of the complaints have dealt with details of land refoliation and irrigation. The interim report, <br />submitted to the Division 11 water court in July of this year, and evaluating the methods used and <br />progress achieved by Aurora on this project, lends support to some of the conclusions. The report, <br />prepared by a team of three expert wimesses appointed by Judge Tracey's water court, suggests <br />methods for correcting the perceived problems. The U.S. Soil Conservation Service has an interest in <br />this matter because Aurora basically relied on the agency for recommendations. <br /> <br />Based on the preceding background information, GEC proposes that the Ft. Lyon study address <br />revegetation orocedures applicable to the soils, water supply, and climate of lands under the Ft. Lyon <br />~ Don Nielsen, who is uniquely qualified to lead in this task will contact and meet with <br />appropriate representatives of SCS, CSU Extension Service, the Fort Lyon Co. and certain . <br />having knowledge and experience in revegetation work. The objective is to arrange a. ork sessio , <br />resolving problems and conflicts that may exist. Specific output would be a set 0 ternative <br />management systems for revegetation of Ft. Lyon lands. <br /> <br /> <br />15 <br />