My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP09132
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
WSP09132
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:51:28 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:28:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8102
Description
Arkansas River Basin Basic Hydrology
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
12/1/1998
Author
USDA NRCS
Title
Highline Breaks Watershed Otero and Pueblo Counties Colorado
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
129
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />O~155'5 <br /> <br />SCOPE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT <br /> <br />The problems and opportunities of the watershed are directly related to the capabilities <br />and the degree of management of the resources in the watershed'. The inventory and <br />analysis phases for this plan used a scoping process to idontify those economic, <br />environmental, and social areas of primary concern. Specialists gathered detailed <br />information on the current resource conditions. This public; participation process led to <br />further investigation and analysis by NRCS. Scoping and environmental assessment <br />meetings were held for public input. <br /> <br />NRCS conducted a resource inventory to determine current resource conditions. A <br />projection of future conditions was made in order to formulate and compare alternatives <br />and estimate their impacts. <br /> <br />During the initial stages of planning an analysis of a broad range of economic, <br />environmental, and social factors in the watershed was carried out. Those factors that <br />were directly related to the problems and opportunities and/or those that might be <br />significantly affected by any potential project were considered. Also, each of the <br />problems and concerns identified by the sponsors, interested stakeholders and the <br />public at the scoping and environmental assessment meetings, as well as those <br />requiring consideration in any federally funded project, were reviewed and their <br />significance to decision making was determined. Consemlus was reached at the <br />meeting as to the problems and concerns. <br /> <br />The following were the priority issues / concerns raised by the public during the initial <br />meetings. These issues necessitated NRCS to perform more detailed investigations as <br />planning progressed. <br /> <br />1. IWM / water conservation <br />2. Nutrient management <br />3. Delivery system seepage <br />4. Irrigation induced erosion <br />5. Ground and surface water quality <br /> <br />Table C lists the factors considered in this scoping process and their perceived <br />significance to project formulation and decision making. Factors rating "Low" or "None" <br />in Table C were not likely to be affected by the project and were considered insignificant <br />to decision making. Therefore, these factors are not discussed in this document. <br />Those factors that have a "High" or "Medium" impact on the watershed would be <br />affected by the project and were significant in decision making. A detailed study was <br />then made on these factors by assessing the current conditions, formulating and <br />comparing alternatives, and determining impacts of a selected plan. <br /> <br />25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.