Laserfiche WebLink
<br />l. <br /> <br />"'::~":~'7~f:!i'~'~I~"':.., "d;," <br /> <br />140 <br /> <br />PUBLIC LAND LAW REVIEW <br /> <br />[Vol. 15 <br /> <br />1994] <br /> <br />GRAND CANYON PROTECTION ACT <br /> <br />141 <br /> <br />A. BOR and Hydropower <br />The Department of the Interior (DOl) is charged with responsibility <br />for overseeing dam operations under the CRSP A and the CRBP A. Within <br />DOl, the BOR is the agency ultimately charged with meeting water <br />delivery requirements and generating power. <br />Hydropower has developed into a significant source of electricity, <br />providing 13 % of aU generating capacity in the United States.S! In the <br />West, hydropower supplies approximately 42% of all electricity, one. <br />quarter of which is contributed by BOR power plants.8Z Hydropower offers <br />a number of advantages over other sources of energy: it is a renewable <br />resource; it is efficient; it conserves fossil fuels; and it creates no atmo- <br />spheric pollutants.ss The most significant advantage of hydropower. <br />however, is its flexibility, which is the reason hydropower has become such <br />an integral part of the power supply in the West. <br />The ability to meet peak power demand is critical."" The BOR <br />estimates that only 50 % of a power system needs to operate continuously . 3lS <br /> <br />As loads increase during peak periods, however, additional supply is <br />needed instantaneously. Hydropower is best suited to meet this demand <br />due to its ability to start quickly and adjust very rapidly to changes in <br />load." In fact, the most efficient way for a utility to operate is to use its <br />fossil fuel (steam turbine) plants to meet baseloads and hydropower to <br />meet peak demand. S1 <br />The BOR predicts that ever-increasing demand during peak periods <br />may result in possible shortages in generating capacity, particularly in the <br />West, where population growth is outpacing that of the rest of the <br />country.llIJ To satisfy this demand, additional hydropower development is <br />being considered. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) <br />has identified a potential 74,700 megawahs (MW) of additional hydro- <br />power development in the United States, 50,400 MW of which is located in <br />17 western states.39 Obviously, the BOR considers hydropower critical to <br />~tisfy the insatiable demand for electricity. <br /> <br />B. Western and Power Delivery <br /> <br />Originally, the CRSPA authorized the BOR to sell hydropower <br />generated at CRSP A dams directly."o [n December 1977, the Department <br />of Energy Organization Act transferred this authority to the newly created <br />Western.''' Western's mission is <<to implement national energy policy by <br />maintaining a viable marketing program for Federal power over an <br />efficient and reliable transmission system while protectingthe environment <br />and encouraging conservation and the use of renewable resoJurces."4a <br />Marketing federal power is paramount, however, and Wester~'s mandate <br />is to market federal hydroelectric resources "in such a manner as to <br />encourage the most widespread use thereof at the lowest possible rates to <br />consumers .consistent with sound business principles.""" Thus, Western's <br /> <br />language of the CRSP A. The CRBP A identifies specific values tbat <br />override power generation concerns in the event of conflict.~8 These <br />identified values provide some legal basis for a number of groups, including <br />irrigation districts, water conservation districts. fishing enthusiasts, river <br />runners, environmentalists, and electric power districts, to influence <br />operations at Glen Canyon Dam.29 Nevertheless, power generation has <br />evolved as the controlling factor in dam operations.80 The two responsible <br />authorities are the Bureau of Reclamation (BOR) and the Western Area <br />Power Administration (Western). <br /> <br />28. GCES COMMITTEE. supra note 8. at 18. Such water delivery confliw. although planned for. <br />havenotyetl.lCCurrcdsoastotesttherelationshipbetweenpowergellerationandotherusesoftherivet. <br />Id. at 24. <br />29. See STEVEN W. C....ROTHERS & BRY....N T. BROWN. THE COLORADO RIvER THROUGH <br />GRAND C....NYON 173-75 (1991). <br />30. The 1922 Compact specifies annual water delivery obligations to the lower basin and the <br />Board of Reclamation (BOR) sets monthly releases lQ meet the annual target. Daily operation of the; <br />darn is thereforeaUowcd to be flexible and has resu]ted in the emergence 0 fpower generation as tbe <br />primary fa<:tor in daily releases. GCES COMMITTEE. supra note 8. at 24-25. <br />31. BURE....U Of RECLAM....nON. HYDROPOWER 2002-RECLAM....nON.s ENERGY INITI....nvE iv <br />(1991) {hereinafter HYDROPOWER 2002}. Theothersignificant<:ontributors lQ United Statc:s electric <br />generating capacity are fossil fuelsteam plants (62%) andnucleargeneratin8statiollS (14% ).Id.at6. <br />32. ld. at iv. <br />33. Iii. <br />34. Peak periods are those r.~ulting ill the bigbest levels of demand in a utility's loadordemand <br />profile. Demand factors include time of day as well as seasonal requirement;. WESTUN ARE.... PoWER <br />ADMlNISTR....nON. ELECTtUC PoWER M....RKETlNG ElS lJPDATE fOil. THE SAL.T .l..u>E C1n MEA <br />INTEGRATED PROJECTS 9 (May 1, 1992). <br />35. HYDkOPOWER 2002. supra note 31, at 7. <br /> <br />36. Id. Coal and nuclear plants, while exceUentat pr<JViding baseload (lIear-<<lnstanl) capacity, <br />are not efl'ective for meeting peak demands because their POWeToutput t:an not be easily changC(j. <br />WESTERN AREA POWER AOMIr-;lsTR....nON. ENVIRONMENTAL llolPACT ST....TEMENT INFORM....nON <br />P....CKET, POST-1989 POWER MAll.KETING CRITEIl.l.... 15 (Sept. 1990) [hereinafter INFORM....TION <br />P....CKET]. For example, a coal-fired facility can take 24 hours to reach full generating capacity while <br />the generators at Glen Canyon Dam take Ol1lymilll,ltcs. CAROTHERS &. BROWN. supra note 29, at 179. <br />37. HYDllOPOWER 2002. supro note 31, at 7. <br />38. Id. at 4-5. <br />39. ld. at vii. Asa point or reference. thegeneratingcapacityatGlenCanyolI Dam is 1.288 MW. <br />while at Hoover Dam it is 1.930 MW. ld. <br />40. 43 US.C. n 620, 62Oc, 62Of. <br />. 41. 42 US.C. if 7101-7375 (1988). Wcstern was specifieally authoriled. by i 7]52. <br />42. INFORMATION P....CKET. supra note 36. at I. <br />43. WESTERN ARE.... POWEll. ADMINlsn....TION, 1989 ANNU....L REPORT 5 (1989) !hereinaft~ <br />WESTERN REPORTj. Tbismarniateis from section Softhe F100dControl Actof 1944,Pub. L No. 78- <br />S34. S8Stat. 887 (1944) (eodiftedat 16 US.C.t 8255(1988 & Supp.IV 1992). .....hichispartoftM <br />federal re<:lamation laws that govern sales of CRSPA Power. See Salt lake City v. Western Area <br /> <br />1 <br />1 <br /> <br />I, <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />\. <br /> <br />, <br />~'" '.'~' <br /> <br />