Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Conceptual Request for Proposals <br /> <br />. Other factors - Any factors that might reduce the expected <br />perfonnance and degrade the actual (realized) cost effectiveness of <br />the project, <br /> <br />N <br />U1 <br />W <br />N <br /> <br />Although the details of each proposal will be evaluated for performance risk, <br />the following practices would typically rank from lowest risk to highest risk: <br /> <br />. Industrial processes that interrupt brine source, treat the brine, <br />produce a measured (weighed) product, and bill the program, <br />Payments are made annually as salt is produced (or controlled), <br />Measurement of salt is very accurate and only influenced by <br />moisture content, scale accuracy, or laboratory analysis errors" If the <br />program only pays for salt as it is produced and weighed, there is no <br />risk from poor maintenance or management, <br /> <br />. Physical improvements like canal and lateral lining which are least <br />subject to "management" risk but are subject to hydrosalinity <br />monitoring and allocation errors, In the Grand Valley Unit, canal <br />and lateral lining has been proven to be very effective at eliminating <br />seepage, Some uncertainty remains from the regional salt loading <br />estimate and its allocation, For example, in the Grand Valley Unit, <br />the regional salt pickup was estimated by the U,S, Geological Survey <br />to be between 480,000 to 680,000 tons per year, Cost effectiveness <br />should be based on the average regional salt pickup, In the case of <br />the Grand Valley Unit, this was 580,000 tons per year, equalizing <br />the upside and downside risk caused by the uncertainty of the <br />regional salt pickup estimate, <br /> <br />. Physical improvements like sprinkler systems or automated irriga- <br />tion systems which are less prone to "management" risk. These <br />types of improvements are subject to uncertainty in the actual <br />management of the system as well as the regional salt loading <br />estimate and its allocation between sources, <br /> <br />. Irrigation management, These types of improvements are highly <br />sensitive to the degree of irrigation management and are much less <br />reliable than automated improvements, These practices are easily <br />abandoned and require continued technical assistance to sustain in <br />the field, Irrigation management can be effective if its initial costs <br />are low and the technical assistance is provided through the project's <br />life to sustain its benefits, <br /> <br />C.4 Negotiation <br /> <br />If discussions are necessary, the Contracting Officer (CO) will enter into <br />such discussions with those offerors whose response to this RFP falls within <br />the competitive range, The competitive range will be established by the CO <br /> <br />C-14 <br />