Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Conceptual Request for Proposals <br /> <br />8.3 53.215-7 Unnecessarily Elaborate Proposals <br />or Qudtations <br /> <br />M <br />UI <br />tv <br />W <br /> <br />Unneces~arily elaborate brochures or other presentations beyond those <br />sufficient to present a complete and effective response to this solicitation are <br />not desixled and may be construed as an indication of the offeror's or quoter's <br />lack of cost consciousness, Elaborate art work, expensive paper and <br />bindings; expensive visual and other presentation aids, or excessively long <br />proposal/; are neither necessary nor wanted, <br /> <br />8.4 52/215-8 Amendments to Solicitations <br /> <br />(a) If this solicitation is amended, then all terms and conditions that <br />are n0t modified remain unchanged, <br /> <br />(b) Offerors shall acknowledge receipt of any amendment to this <br />solici1Jation by identifying the amendment number and date in the space <br />provi4ed for this purpose on the form for submitting an offer, <br /> <br />8.5 52.215-9 Submission of Offers <br /> <br />Offers shall be submitted in sealed envelopes or packages (1) addressed <br />to the office specified in the solicitation and (2) showing the time specified <br />for receipt, the solicitation number, and the name and address of the offeror. <br /> <br />8.6 52.215-10 Late Submissions, Modifications, and <br />WithdraWals of Proposals <br /> <br />(a) Any proposal received at the office designated in the solicitation <br />after the exact time specified for receipt will not be considered unless it <br />is received before award is made and it: <br /> <br />(1) Was sent by registered or certified mail not later than the fifth <br />calendar day before the date specified for receipt of offers (e,g. an <br />offer submitted in response to a solicitation requiring receipt of <br />dffers by the 20th of the month must have been mailed by the <br />15th), <br /> <br />(2) Was sent by mail and it is determined by the Reclamation that <br />t}le late receipt was due solely to mishandling by the QQvernment <br />a!fter receipt at the Government installation. <br /> <br />C-5 <br /> <br />