My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP09003
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
WSP09003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:50:36 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:24:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.102.03.I
Description
Colorado River Water Projects - Aspinall Storage Unit - Morrow Point - Environmental Studies
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
6/5/2002
Author
DOI-BOR
Title
Morrow Point Trash Rack Cleaning Project - Draft Environmental Assessment
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />... <br /> <br />OOiJ7J5 <br /> <br />.' <br /> <br />Gunnison River would be established and the work might be temporarily stopped if <br />turbidity readings exceed desired conditions. <br /> <br />Aspinall Operations <br /> <br />Releases from the Aspinall Unit and flows below the Gunnison Tunnel would be unaffected by <br />the project. Releases from Blue Mesa Dam during the draw down would be reduced to facilitate <br />the draw down and gradually increased during the refill. Blue Mesa and Morrow Point Dam <br />releases would be adjusted by Reclamation as needcd to control Morrow Point Reservoir's <br />elevation at or near 7.129 ft. and protect downstream water quality. During the draw down. Blue <br />Mesa releases could be made as peaking releases or uniform releases. The uniform releases <br />would reduce the potential for suspended sediment in the water. Reclamation proposes to use <br />peak releases. with a commitment to change to uniform releases if turbidity increases <br />downstream, Gunnison Tunnel diversions will also nO( be affected, <br /> <br />Other Alternatives Eliminated for Detailed Analysis <br /> <br />Other alterna[ives considcred but eliminatcd from dctailed analysis included: <br /> <br />I. Using divers to clean the trash rack without ;. reservoir draw down, This alternative was <br />not considered feasible because of the reduced diver's bOllom time (time actually <br />cleaning the trash racks), Under the proposed plan. divers would be working in 30 fcet of <br />water. compared [060 feet of water without the rescrvoir draw down, <br /> <br />2. Draw down of Morrow Point Reservoir to elevation 7, 100 ft. and using divers or crane [0 <br />clean the trash rack, This alternative was originally proposed but has been eliminated <br />because of landslide issues and the cost of monitoring landslide movement. Potential <br />impacts to downstream resources would also increase with additional exposed sediments as a <br />result of the additional reservoir draw down, <br /> <br />3, Timing of Reservoir Draw Down. Alternate times of year for implementing the trash rack <br />cleaning project were considered but found not feasible. A reservoir drawn down in the <br />spring was considered not feasible because it could trigger landslide movements with <br />saturated soils, A winter reservoir draw down was also considered not feasible because of <br />potential trash rack icing problems and inclement weather. <br /> <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.